130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37864117)
1. Comparing DIC and WAIC for multilevel models with missing data.
Du H; Keller B; Alacam E; Enders C
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):2731-2750. PubMed ID: 37864117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian Comparison of Latent Variable Models: Conditional Versus Marginal Likelihoods.
Merkle EC; Furr D; Rabe-Hesketh S
Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):802-829. PubMed ID: 31297664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing multilevel and multiscale convolution models for small area aggregated health data.
Aregay M; Lawson AB; Faes C; Kirby RS; Carroll R; Watjou K
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 22():39-49. PubMed ID: 28760266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian multi-scale modeling for aggregated disease mapping data.
Aregay M; Lawson AB; Faes C; Kirby RS
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2726-2742. PubMed ID: 26420779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian model selection for incomplete data using the posterior predictive distribution.
Daniels MJ; Chatterjee AS; Wang C
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22551040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Empirical-likelihood-based criteria for model selection on marginal analysis of longitudinal data with dropout missingness.
Chen C; Shen B; Zhang L; Xue Y; Wang M
Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):950-965. PubMed ID: 31004449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hierarchical Bayesian models for overdispersed count data using DIC and Bayes' factors.
Millar RB
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):962-9. PubMed ID: 19173704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian model selection in linear mixed models for longitudinal data.
Ariyo O; Quintero A; Muñoz J; Verbeke G; Lesaffre E
J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(5):890-913. PubMed ID: 35707327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A one-step-ahead pseudo-DIC for comparison of Bayesian state-space models.
Millar RB; McKechnie S
Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):972-80. PubMed ID: 25370730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying the Best Approximating Model in Bayesian Phylogenetics: Bayes Factors, Cross-Validation or wAIC?
Lartillot N
Syst Biol; 2023 Jun; 72(3):616-638. PubMed ID: 36810802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing hierarchical models via the marginalized deviance information criterion.
Quintero A; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(16):2440-2454. PubMed ID: 29579777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Monte Carlo Methods for Computing Marginal Likelihoods of Item Response Theory Models.
Liu Y; Hu G; Cao L; Wang X; Chen MH
J Korean Stat Soc; 2019 Dec; 48(4):503-512. PubMed ID: 31929720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel models with the R package mdmb: a flexible sequential modeling approach.
Grund S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Dec; 53(6):2631-2649. PubMed ID: 34027594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian model selection for spatial capture-recapture models.
Dey S; Delampady M; Gopalaswamy AM
Ecol Evol; 2019 Oct; 9(20):11569-11583. PubMed ID: 31695869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian variable selection for the Cox regression model with missing covariates.
Ibrahim JG; Chen MH; Kim S
Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Dec; 14(4):496-520. PubMed ID: 18836829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the practical differences between model selection methods in inferences about choice response time tasks.
Evans NJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1070-1098. PubMed ID: 30783896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist model selection methods for factor analysis models.
Lu ZH; Chow SM; Loken E
Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):361-381. PubMed ID: 28594228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian model selection for generalized linear mixed models.
Xu S; Ferreira MAR; Porter EM; Franck CT
Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3266-3278. PubMed ID: 37365985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian analysis for generalized linear models with nonignorably missing covariates.
Huang L; Chen MH; Ibrahim JG
Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):767-80. PubMed ID: 16135028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian and Frequentist Analytical Approaches Using Log-Normal and Gamma Frailty Parametric Models for Breast Cancer Mortality.
Alotaibi RM; Guure C
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():9076567. PubMed ID: 32089731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
