156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37864175)
1. Using novel porous metal pillars for tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Tang Q; Guo S; Deng W; Zhou Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Oct; 24(1):829. PubMed ID: 37864175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes between an isolated tibial component revision and total revision knee arthroplasty in aseptic loosening of an isolated tibial component.
Lee SS; Park JS; Lee YK; Moon YW
J Orthop Sci; 2021 May; 26(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 32620342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double metal tibial blocks augmentation in total knee arthroplasty.
Chung KS; Lee JK; Lee HJ; Choi CH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jan; 24(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 25300362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty with tantalum monoblock tibial component and cemented tibial plateau prosthesis in patients of different ages].
Jiao Y; Zhang X; Askar Mamtimin ; Xu B; Li G; Cao L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1563-1573. PubMed ID: 34913313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.
Pulido L; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Stuart MJ; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24687433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cementless Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short- to Mid-Term Outcomes.
Shen J; Zhang T; Zhang Y; Dong Y; Zhou Y; Guo L
Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(2):488-495. PubMed ID: 36479829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midterm Comparison of Tibial Fixation between Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and Substituting Porous Tantalum Total Knee Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.
Kaneko T; Kono N; Mochizuki Y; Hada M; Toyoda S; Ikegami H; Musha Y
J Knee Surg; 2021 Jan; 34(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 31288269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of 10-mm-Deep or Greater Uncontained Tibial Bone Defects in Primary Total Knee Reconstruction without Metal Augmentation: Autologous Oblique Structural Peg Bone and Cancellous Chip Bone Grafting.
Chon JG; Kang JW; Kim CU; Jeong U; Go J
Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 34094007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a 3D-printed total knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: assessment of highly porous biological fixation of the tibial baseplate and metal-backed patellar component.
Sporer S; MacLean L; Burger A; Moric M
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7_Supple_C):40-47. PubMed ID: 31256643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Autologous Impaction Bone Grafting for Bone Defects of the Medial Tibia Plateau During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Propensity Score Matched Analysis With a Minimum of 7-Year Follow-Up.
Sohn JM; In Y; Jeon SH; Nho JY; Kim MS
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2465-2470. PubMed ID: 29588122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty.
Tsukada S; Wakui M; Matsueda M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 8():36. PubMed ID: 24139483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using allogenous structural bone graft for uncontained tibial bone defects ≥ 10 mm in depth in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Iwase D; Metoki Y; Kusumoto Y; Aikawa J; Fukushima K; Takano S; Mukai M; Uchida K; Inoue G; Takaso M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jun; 23(1):528. PubMed ID: 35655195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of cementless porous tantalum tibial components versus cemented tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
Li L; Pan C; Zhang X; Liu W; Zhang T; Liu Y; Li J; Ma Y; Jia C; Liu X; Shi C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Apr; 103(14):e37697. PubMed ID: 38579049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of severe medial compartment osteoarthritis].
Huang Q; Zeng Y; Hu Q; Si H; Nie Y; Shen B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1125-1132. PubMed ID: 34523277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
Hu B; Chen Y; Zhu H; Wu H; Yan S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):666-674. PubMed ID: 27776898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Tibial Bone Defects Using Patient-Customized Three-Dimensional-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Li Y; Wang X; Tian H
Orthop Surg; 2022 Jun; 14(6):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 35466578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term Follow-up of Antibiotic-loaded Articulating Cement Spacers in Two-stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.
Tian MQ; Yang XT; Tian XB; Sun YB; Duan YH; Sun L
Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 29770589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of tibial bone defects with metal augmentation in primary total knee replacement: a minimum five-year review.
Lee JK; Choi CH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Nov; 93(11):1493-6. PubMed ID: 22058300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Difference Between Screw Cement Filling and Adequate Osteotomy With Thick Liner for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Rand IIb Tibial Defects.
Liu C; Li J; Sun C; Wei Z; Yang Q; Sun P; Li S
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Aug; 38(8):1510-1515. PubMed ID: 36773662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component.
Hayakawa K; Date H; Tsujimura S; Nojiri S; Yamada H; Nakagawa K
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 23871406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
