152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37864986)
1. A review of digital PET-CT technology: Comparing performance parameters in SiPM integrated digital PET-CT systems.
Singh MK
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 37864986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance Characteristics of a New-Generation Digital Bismuth Germanium Oxide PET/CT System, Omni Legend 32, According to NEMA NU 2-2018 Standards.
Yamagishi S; Miwa K; Kamitaki S; Anraku K; Sato S; Yamao T; Kubo H; Miyaji N; Oguchi K
J Nucl Med; 2023 Dec; 64(12):1990-1997. PubMed ID: 37857503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance Characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT System with a Long Axial Field of View Using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard.
Prenosil GA; Sari H; Fürstner M; Afshar-Oromieh A; Shi K; Rominger A; Hentschel M
J Nucl Med; 2022 Mar; 63(3):476-484. PubMed ID: 34301780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo evaluation of hypothetical long axial field-of-view PET scanner using GE Discovery MI PET front-end architecture.
Tiwari A; Merrick M; Graves SA; Sunderland J
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1139-1152. PubMed ID: 34954831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.
Spencer BA; Berg E; Schmall JP; Omidvari N; Leung EK; Abdelhafez YG; Tang S; Deng Z; Dong Y; Lv Y; Bao J; Liu W; Li H; Jones T; Badawi RD; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):861-870. PubMed ID: 33008932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical performance of adaptive axial FOV PET scanners with a sparse detector block rings or a checkerboard configuration.
Karakatsanis NA; Nehmeh MH; Conti M; Bal G; González AJ; Nehmeh SA
Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(10):. PubMed ID: 35472757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical performance of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner prototype with sparse rings configuration: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Zein SA; Karakatsanis NA; Issa M; Haj-Ali AA; Nehmeh SA
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1949-1957. PubMed ID: 31985827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of cost-effective system designs for long axial field-of-view PET scanners.
Surti S; Werner ME; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(10):. PubMed ID: 37084744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and evaluation of a new high-TOF-resolution all-digital brain PET system.
Fang L; Zhang B; Li B; Zhang X; Zhou X; Yang J; Li A; Shi X; Liu Y; Kreissl M; D'Ascenzo N; Xiao P; Xie Q
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jan; 69(2):. PubMed ID: 38100841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical and clinical assessment of latest technology SiPM integrated digital PETCT scanner.
Singh MK; Mohan P; Mahajan H; Kaushik C
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jul; 29(4):705-711. PubMed ID: 37187068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NEMA NU 2-2018 performance evaluation of a new generation 30-cm axial field-of-view Discovery MI PET/CT.
Zeimpekis KG; Kotasidis FA; Huellner M; Nemirovsky A; Kaufmann PA; Treyer V
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jul; 49(9):3023-3032. PubMed ID: 35284970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NEMA NU2-2012 performance measurements of the United Imaging uPMR790: an integrated PET/MR system.
Chen S; Gu Y; Yu H; Chen X; Cao T; Hu L; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 48(6):1726-1735. PubMed ID: 33388972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulating NEMA characteristics of the modular total-body J-PET scanner-an economic total-body PET from plastic scintillators.
Moskal P; Kowalski P; Shopa RY; Raczyński L; Baran J; Chug N; Curceanu C; Czerwiński E; Dadgar M; Dulski K; Gajos A; Hiesmayr BC; Kacprzak K; Kapłon Ł; Kisielewska D; Klimaszewski K; Kopka P; Korcyl G; Krawczyk N; Krzemień W; Kubicz E; Niedźwiecki S; Parzych S; Raj J; Sharma S; Shivani S; Stępień E; Tayefi F; Wiślicki W
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(17):. PubMed ID: 34289460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of PMT-based TF64 and SiPM-based Vereos PET/CT systems for
Trotta N; Collette B; Mathey C; Vierasu I; Bucalau AM; Verset G; Moreno-Reyes R; Goldman S
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7567-7582. PubMed ID: 35894818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.
Zhang X; Badawi RD; Cherry SR; Qi J
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jun; 63(13):135010. PubMed ID: 29799814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of PET scanner designs using clinical metrics to optimize the scanner axial FOV and crystal thickness.
Surti S; Werner ME; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):3995-4012. PubMed ID: 23685783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system.
Grant AM; Deller TW; Khalighi MM; Maramraju SH; Delso G; Levin CS
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2334. PubMed ID: 27147345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.
Surti S; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(13):5343-58. PubMed ID: 26108352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
