144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37865418)
1. Efficacy and safety of articaine in 3-year-old children for dental procedures: a protocol for a clinical randomised control trial in Saudi Arabia.
Alrashdi M; Alhunti A; Almansour A
BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e077751. PubMed ID: 37865418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia.
St George G; Morgan A; Meechan J; Moles DR; Needleman I; Ng YL; Petrie A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(7):CD006487. PubMed ID: 29990391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
Massignan C; Silveira Santos P; Cardoso M; Bolan M
J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 47(8):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 32383196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Articaine efficacy and safety in young children below the age of four years: An equivalent parallel randomized control trial.
Elheeny AAH
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2020 Sep; 30(5):547-555. PubMed ID: 32223002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.
Odabaş ME; Cınar C; Deveci C; Alaçam A
Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 22353456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% mepivacaine in mandibular third molar germectomy using different anaesthetic techniques: a split-mouth clinical trial.
Menditti D; Boccellino M; Nucci L; Ribeiro Sobrinho AP; Marotta A; Angrisani P; Cantore S; Menditti M; Vitiello A; DI Domenico M; Rinaldi B; DE Rosa A
Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 36847742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis.
Katyal V
J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 20006669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volume and effectiveness assessment of articain 4% versus mepivacaine 2% used in third molar surgery: randomized, double-blind, split-mouth controlled clinical trial.
Almeida PC; Raldi FV; Sato FR; Nascimento RD; Moraes MB
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 Nov; 25(6):e762-e768. PubMed ID: 32701928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of articaine, lidocaine and mepivacaine for buccal infiltration after inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular posterior teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Gao X; Meng K
Br Dent J; 2020 Apr; 228(8):605-608. PubMed ID: 32332962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and efficacy of 4% articaine in mandibular third-molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Santos-Sanz L; Toledano-Serrabona J; Gay-Escoda C
J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Dec; 151(12):912-923.e10. PubMed ID: 33228884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
Colombini BL; Modena KC; Calvo AM; Sakai VT; Giglio FP; Dionísio TJ; Trindade AS; Lauris JR; Santos CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anaesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in children's dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tong HJ; Alzahrani FS; Sim YF; Tahmassebi JF; Duggal M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Jul; 28(4):347-360. PubMed ID: 29635712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of articaine and lidocaine local anaesthetic in child patients.
Bonifacio CC
Evid Based Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 30573862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study.
Jorgenson K; Burbridge L; Cole B
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Feb; 21(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 31832992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine compared with 2% mepivacaine: a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial.
Bortoluzzi MC; de Camargo Smolarek P; Cecato R; Pochapski MT; Chibinski ACR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 47(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 29199070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients.
Malamed SF; Gagnon S; Leblanc D
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 10969438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200,000) and articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200,000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry--a randomised double-blind study.
Hintze A; Paessler L
Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Jun; 10(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16491339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy of articaine and prilocaine local anaesthesia for pulpotomy of maxillary and mandibular primary molars.
Yilmaz Y; Eyuboglu O; Keles S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jun; 12(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 21668284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
