These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37865553)

  • 21. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study.
    Knechtle N; Wiedemeier D; Mehl A; Ender A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 33612335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Limited evidence suggests complete arch digital scans are less time efficient than conventional impression.
    Sedky A; Abd-Elwahab Radi I
    Evid Based Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(4):138-139. PubMed ID: 33339976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study.
    Pera F; Pesce P; Bagnasco F; Pancini N; Carossa M; Baldelli L; Annunziata M; Migliorati M; Baldi D; Menini M
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jan; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 36676569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.
    Drancourt N; Auduc C; Mouget A; Mouminoux J; Auroy P; Veyrune JL; El Osta N; Nicolas E
    J Pers Med; 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37241002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: A systematic review.
    Paratelli A; Vania S; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):844-854. PubMed ID: 34756427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review.
    Ahlholm P; Sipilä K; Vallittu P; Jakonen M; Kotiranta U
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 27483210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research progress on accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for implant-supported full-arch prostheses.
    Zhu J; Zhao K; Gu X
    Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Jun; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38832462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal adaptation of zirconia complete-coverage fixed dental restorations made from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tabesh M; Nejatidanesh F; Savabi G; Davoudi A; Savabi O; Mirmohammadi H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):603-610. PubMed ID: 32284188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical influence of digital vs analog impressions in all-on-4 implant prostheses: a randomized controlled trial.
    Elawady DM; Ibrahim WI
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Mar; 25(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 35322650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of digital implant impressions obtained using intraoral scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies.
    Ma J; Zhang B; Song H; Wu D; Song T
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Dec; 9(1):48. PubMed ID: 38055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does Splinting the Direct Copings Increase the Impression Accuracy of Two-Unit Nonparallel Implant Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ma Y; Al-Radhi RYZ; Jiang L; Yu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 35904821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of photogrammetric imaging versus conventional impressions for complete arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A comparative clinical study.
    Zhang YJ; Qian SJ; Lai HC; Shi JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 34776266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conventional and Digital Impressions for Fabrication of Complete Implant-Supported Bars: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Vieira SNV; Lourenço MF; Pereira RC; França EC; Vilaça ÊL; Silveira RR; Silva GC
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jun; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 37297310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
    Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: A pilot clinical trial.
    Roig E; Roig M; Garza LC; Costa S; Maia P; Espona J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 33610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In Vivo and In Vitro Comparison of Internal and Marginal Fit of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Coverage Fixed Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Hasanzade M; Shirani M; Afrashtehfar KI; Naseri P; Alikhasi M
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 19(3):236-254. PubMed ID: 31732100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.