These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37865831)
1. Update on minimally invasive cardiac surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery. Salenger R; Lobdell K; Grant MC Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2024 Feb; 37(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 37865831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal Management of Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in the Era of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Fast-Track Protocols: A Narrative Review. Maj G; Regesta T; Campanella A; Cavozza C; Parodi G; Audo A J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2022 Mar; 36(3):766-775. PubMed ID: 33840614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Establishment of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive heart valve surgery. Kubitz JC; Schulte-Uentrop L; Zoellner C; Lemke M; Messner-Schmitt A; Kalbacher D; Sill B; Reichenspurner H; Koell B; Girdauskas E PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231378. PubMed ID: 32271849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug, devices, technologies, and techniques for blood management in minimally invasive and conventional cardiothoracic surgery: a consensus statement from the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2011. Menkis AH; Martin J; Cheng DC; Fitzgerald DC; Freedman JJ; Gao C; Koster A; Mackenzie GS; Murphy GJ; Spiess B; Ad N Innovations (Phila); 2012; 7(4):229-41. PubMed ID: 23123988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced Length of Hospital Stay for Cardiac Surgery-Implementing an Optimized Perioperative Pathway: Prospective Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Designed for Mini-Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement. Zaouter C; Oses P; Assatourian S; Labrousse L; Rémy A; Ouattara A J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3010-3019. PubMed ID: 31153719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mitral valve repair with minimally invasive approaches vs sternotomy: A meta-analysis of early and late results in randomized and matched observational studies. Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Cavalcanti LRP; Kadyraliev B; Enginoev S; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Dreyfus G J Card Surg; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2307-2323. PubMed ID: 32668091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced recovery after minimally invasive heart valve surgery: Early and midterm outcomes. Berretta P; De Angelis V; Alfonsi J; Pierri MD; Malvindi PG; Zahedi HM; Munch C; Di Eusanio M Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 370():98-104. PubMed ID: 36375597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore. Ong ZX; Wu D; Luo H; Chang G; Sazzad F; Sule JA; Hu P; Kofidis T Singapore Med J; 2022 Nov; 63(11):641-648. PubMed ID: 34602601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Opioid-free anesthesia within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective matched cohort study. Soffin EM; Wetmore DS; Beckman JD; Sheha ED; Vaishnav AS; Albert TJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E8. PubMed ID: 30933925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different approach, similar outcomes: the impact of surgical access routes in minimally invasive cardiac surgery on enhanced recovery after surgery. Berger Veith S; Holst T; Erfani S; Pochert J; Dumps C; Girdauskas E; Stock S Front Cardiovasc Med; 2024; 11():1412829. PubMed ID: 39011491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Device Closure for Atrial Septal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mylonas KS; Ziogas IA; Evangeliou A; Hemmati P; Schizas D; Sfyridis PG; Economopoulos KP; Bakoyiannis C; Kapelouzou A; Tzifa A; Avgerinos DV Pediatr Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 41(5):853-861. PubMed ID: 32162027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives. Iribarne A; Easterwood R; Chan EY; Yang J; Soni L; Russo MJ; Smith CR; Argenziano M Future Cardiol; 2011 May; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 21627475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Closing the care gap: combining enhanced recovery with minimally invasive valve surgery. Gregory AJ; Kent WDT; Adams C; Arora RC Curr Opin Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 39(4):380-387. PubMed ID: 38606679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Petersen J; Kloth B; Konertz J; Kubitz J; Schulte-Uentrop L; Ketels G; Reichenspurner H; Girdauskas E BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Mar; 21(1):254. PubMed ID: 33743698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decreases Length of Stay and Opioid Consumption. Kerolus MG; Yerneni K; Witiw CD; Shelton A; Canar WJ; Daily D; Fontes RBV; Deutsch H; Fessler RG; Buvanendran A; O'Toole JE Neurosurgery; 2021 Feb; 88(3):648-657. PubMed ID: 33469652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Elements that Most Greatly Impact Length of Stay and Readmission. Olson KA; Fleming RYD; Fox AW; Grimes AE; Mohiuddin SS; Robertson HT; Moxham J; Wolf JS Am Surg; 2021 Mar; 87(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 33047966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]