These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37866226)

  • 21. Fano cavity test for electron Monte Carlo transport algorithms in magnetic fields: comparison between EGSnrc, PENELOPE, MCNP6 and Geant4.
    Lee J; Lee J; Ryu D; Lee H; Ye SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(19):195013. PubMed ID: 30183683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of a Monte Carlo model for multi leaf collimator based electron delivery.
    Kaluarachchi MM; Saleh ZH; Schwer ML; Klein EE
    Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3586-3599. PubMed ID: 32324289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of ambient pressure on well chamber response: Monte Carlo calculated results for the HDR 1000 plus.
    Bohm TD; Griffin SL; DeLuca PM; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1103-14. PubMed ID: 15895595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measured and Monte Carlo calculated K(Q) factors: accuracy and comparison.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4600-9. PubMed ID: 21928633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets.
    Capote R; Sánchez-Doblado F; Leal A; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2416-22. PubMed ID: 15487721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monte Carlo calculated calibration settings for commercially available nuclear medicine ionization chambers.
    Pain CD; O'Keefe GJ; Scott AM
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1874-1887. PubMed ID: 35041767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Output correction factors for nine small field detectors in 6 MV radiation therapy photon beams: a PENELOPE Monte Carlo study.
    Benmakhlouf H; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041711. PubMed ID: 24694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of Monte Carlo simulated absorbed-dose-to-water inside a custom SPECT/CT phantom using active and passive dosimeters: a feasibility study using
    Bertinetti A; Rodrigues M; Palmer B; Garcia TR; Vija AH; Culberson W
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(8):. PubMed ID: 36944253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitive volume effects on Monte Carlo calculated ion chamber response in magnetic fields.
    Malkov VN; Rogers DWO
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4854-4858. PubMed ID: 28636763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental verification of EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculated depth doses within a realistic parallel magnetic field in a polystyrene phantom.
    Ghila A; Steciw S; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4804-4815. PubMed ID: 28626920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of magnetic field correction factors
    Alissa M; Zink K; Kapsch RP; Schoenfeld AA; Frick S; Czarnecki D
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4578-4589. PubMed ID: 36897832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Establishment of air kerma reference standard for low dose rate Cs-137 brachytherapy sources.
    Sharma SD; Kumar S; Srinivasan P; Chourasiya G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 12(4):3553. PubMed ID: 22089009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An inter-comparison between accuracy of EGSnrc and MCNPX Monte Carlo codes in dosimetric characterization of intraoperative electron beam.
    Lashkari S; Baghani HR; Tavakoli MB; Mahdavi SR
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jan; 128():104113. PubMed ID: 33197735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The energy response of a T.P.A. Mk-II ionization chamber using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulation.
    Seneviratne MD; Reinhard MI; Baldock C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3837-46. PubMed ID: 17664580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations.
    Pacilio M; Lanconelli N; Lo MS; Betti M; Montani L; Torres AL; Coca PM
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1543-52. PubMed ID: 19544770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relevance of Internal Bremsstrahlung photons from
    Auditore L; Juget F; Italiano A; Pistone D; Nedjadi Y; Gnesin S; Amato E
    Phys Med; 2021 Oct; 90():158-163. PubMed ID: 34662819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
    González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electron beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers: Monte Carlo calculations using the PENELOPE system.
    Sempau J; Andreo P; Aldana J; Mazurier J; Salvat F
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4427-44. PubMed ID: 15509075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.