169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37867014)
21. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns designed using three different dental CAD programs: a 3-dimensional digital analysis study.
Farah RI; Alresheedi B
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):263-271. PubMed ID: 36100722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique.
Zeller S; Guichet D; Kontogiorgos E; Nagy WW
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does cad software affect the marginal and internal fit of milled full ceramic crowns?
Akat B; Şentürk A; Ocak M; Kiliçarslan MA; Özcan M
Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e042. PubMed ID: 35293507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital evaluation of the effect of nanosilica-lithium spray coating on the internal and marginal fit of high translucent zirconia crowns.
Liang S; Yuan F; Chen H; Sun Y
J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104503. PubMed ID: 37001793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Marginal gap and internal fit of 3D printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns.
Refaie A; Fouda A; Bourauel C; Singer L
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):448. PubMed ID: 37403169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
Peng CC; Chung KH; Yau HT; Ramos V
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.
Yadav P; Sharma V; Paliwal J; Meena KK; Madaan R; Gurjar B
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33940. PubMed ID: 36819334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Chairside measurement of the marginal and internal fit of crowns: a new intraoral scan-based approach.
Schlenz MA; Vogler JAH; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2459-2468. PubMed ID: 31673857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative evaluation of marginal fit and microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-milled zirconia and prefabricated posterior occlusal veneers: An in vitrostudy.
Bhati V; Kapoor V; Pasricha N; Raman S; Sirana P
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jul; 24(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 38946505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3-dimensional gel deposition.
Sun Z; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zheng Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 35135676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions.
Praça L; Pekam FC; Rego RO; Radermacher K; Wolfart S; Marotti J
Dent Mater; 2018 Nov; 34(11):e280-e288. PubMed ID: 30268677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of a new support design on the marginal and internal gap of additively manufactured interim crowns using direct light deposition technology.
Khanlar LN; Francis C; Basir Barmak A; Rios ALS; Ashtiani RE; Zandinejad A
J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 36810925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
