158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37867014)
41. Effect of a new support design on the marginal and internal gap of additively manufactured interim crowns using direct light deposition technology.
Khanlar LN; Francis C; Basir Barmak A; Rios ALS; Ashtiani RE; Zandinejad A
J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 36810925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
Abduo J; Ho G; Centorame A; Chohan S; Park C; Abdouni R; Le P; Ngo C
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
Su TS; Sun J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods.
Fasih P; Tavakolizadeh S; Sedaghat Monfared M; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Yari A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
Meirowitz A; Bitterman Y; Levy S; Mijiritsky E; Dolev E
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology.
Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.
Del Piñal M; Lopez-Suarez C; Bartolome JF; Volpato CA; Suarez MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate CAD-CAM crowns: An in vitro comparison of the silicone replica technique, direct view, and 3-dimensional superimposition analysis.
El-Ashkar A; Taymour M; El-Tannir A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):769-776. PubMed ID: 34479719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Trueness of stereolithography ZrO
Lee HB; Bea EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
Dent Mater J; 2023 Jan; 42(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 36288942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of CAD-CAM tool deterioration on the trueness of ceramic restorations.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan RB; Al Rashdan BA; Al Quran FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 33342613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a CAD/CAM zirconia-based ceramic crown system.
Baig MR; Al-Tarakemah Y; Kasim NHA; Omar R
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):319–329. PubMed ID: 33616567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing.
Wang W; Yu H; Liu Y; Jiang X; Gao B
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 30017167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study.
Lerner H; Nagy K; Pranno N; Zarone F; Admakin O; Mangano F
J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103792. PubMed ID: 34481929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures fabricated from conventional impressions and digital scans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Morsy N; El Kateb M; Azer A; Fathalla S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 34696907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Strength and Adaptation of Stereolithography-Fabricated Zirconia Dental Crowns: An In Vitro Study.
Li R; Wang Y; Hu M; Wang Y; Xv Y; Liu Y; Sun Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(5):439-443. PubMed ID: 31486816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. New Intraoral Scanner-Based Chairside Measurement Method to Investigate the Internal Fit of Crowns: A Clinical Trial.
Schlenz MA; Vogler J; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32218254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design.
Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
