These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3786708)

  • 1. Excretory urography with iohexol: evaluation in children.
    Magill HL; Clarke EA; Fitch SJ; Boulden TF; Ramirez R; Siegle RL; Somes GW
    Radiology; 1986 Dec; 161(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 3786708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iodixanol in paediatric excretory urography: efficiency and safety compared to iohexol.
    Dacher J; Sirinelli D; Boscq M; Hassan M; Garel C; Chateil JF; Amar C
    Pediatr Radiol; 1998 Feb; 28(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 9472058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats.
    Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC
    Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The optimum dose of iohexol 399 in excretory urography].
    Ohshima S; Matsuura O; Takeuchi N; Hattori R; Hashimoto J; Segawa A
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Aug; 35(8):1457-62. PubMed ID: 2683658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients.
    Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Excretory urography: comparison of the ionic contrast medium amidotrezoic acid with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol].
    Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Pinterits F; Metz V
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):48-50. PubMed ID: 2650470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality control in urography with iopamidol and iohexol. A parallel comparison].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M; Ukovich W
    Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 3562919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
    Thompson WM; Foster WL; Halvorsen RA; Dunnick NR; Rommel AJ; Bates M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gadolinium-enhanced excretory MR urography after low-dose diuretic injection: comparison with conventional excretory urography.
    Nolte-Ernsting CC; Bücker A; Adam GB; Neuerburg JM; Jung P; Hunter DW; Jakse G; Günther RW
    Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 9769826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species].
    Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA
    Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience with iohexol versus iopromide in excretory urography.
    Bischoff W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():108-10. PubMed ID: 2568776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iopromide dosage and urographic image quality: is there an optimal dose?
    Dominik R; Keysser R; Taenzer V
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():111-5. PubMed ID: 2568777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical study of iohexol in excretory urography].
    Nagai T; Okamura K; Yokoi K; Ando T; Sahashi M; Miyake K; Kobayashi H; Obata K; Fukatsu H; Segawa A
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Aug; 36(8):963-7. PubMed ID: 2239603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of urograms in infants: a comparison of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide and iohexol.
    Rawlinson J; Hyde I; Williams J
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):592-5. PubMed ID: 3408847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Preclinical evaluation of iotrolan as a contrast medium for angiography and urography].
    Miyazawa T; Murayama C; Uchimoto R; Fritz-Zieroth B
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Sep; 52(9):1287-98. PubMed ID: 1437534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography.
    Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two strengths of iohexol and iothalamate in urography.
    Davies P; Glaves J; Panto P; Richardson RE
    Urol Radiol; 1987; 9(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 3603888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.