These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats. Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients. Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Excretory urography: comparison of the ionic contrast medium amidotrezoic acid with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol]. Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Pinterits F; Metz V Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):48-50. PubMed ID: 2650470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Quality control in urography with iopamidol and iohexol. A parallel comparison]. Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M; Ukovich W Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 3562919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species]. Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical experience with iohexol versus iopromide in excretory urography. Bischoff W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():108-10. PubMed ID: 2568776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iopromide dosage and urographic image quality: is there an optimal dose? Dominik R; Keysser R; Taenzer V Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():111-5. PubMed ID: 2568777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical study of iohexol in excretory urography]. Nagai T; Okamura K; Yokoi K; Ando T; Sahashi M; Miyake K; Kobayashi H; Obata K; Fukatsu H; Segawa A Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Aug; 36(8):963-7. PubMed ID: 2239603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of urograms in infants: a comparison of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide and iohexol. Rawlinson J; Hyde I; Williams J Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):592-5. PubMed ID: 3408847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preclinical evaluation of iotrolan as a contrast medium for angiography and urography]. Miyazawa T; Murayama C; Uchimoto R; Fritz-Zieroth B Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Sep; 52(9):1287-98. PubMed ID: 1437534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography. Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost. Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two strengths of iohexol and iothalamate in urography. Davies P; Glaves J; Panto P; Richardson RE Urol Radiol; 1987; 9(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 3603888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]