These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37867346)

  • 1. When Native Speakers Are Not "Native-Like:" Chunking Ability Predicts (Lack of) Sensitivity to Gender Agreement During Online Processing.
    Pulido MF; López-Beltrán P
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Oct; 47(10):e13366. PubMed ID: 37867346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Chunking Ability Predicts Efficient or Shallow L2 Processing: Eye-Tracking Evidence From Multiword Units in Relative Clauses.
    Pulido MF
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():607621. PubMed ID: 33519614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit Statistical Learning in L2 Sentence Processing: Individual Cognitive Differences.
    Lee OS
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1037-1060. PubMed ID: 37016091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?
    Frank SL; Trompenaars T; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):554-78. PubMed ID: 25943302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events.
    Farmer TA; Fine AB; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):413-433. PubMed ID: 26652283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers' Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading.
    Tan M; Foltz A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():575847. PubMed ID: 33041947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infants use linguistic group distinctions to chunk items in memory.
    Stahl AE; Feigenson L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():149-167. PubMed ID: 29626755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plausibility and structural reanalysis in L1 and L2 sentence comprehension.
    Lee J; Witzel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):319-337. PubMed ID: 35319306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.
    Caplan D; Dede G; Waters G; Michaud J; Tripodis Y
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):439-50. PubMed ID: 21480714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The word order of languages predicts native speakers' working memory.
    Amici F; Sánchez-Amaro A; Sebastián-Enesco C; Cacchione T; Allritz M; Salazar-Bonet J; Rossano F
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1124. PubMed ID: 30718704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects of Sentence Repetition-Based Working Memory Treatment on Sentence Comprehension Abilities in Individuals With Aphasia.
    Eom B; Sung JE
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Dec; 25(4S):S823-S838. PubMed ID: 27997956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension.
    Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.
    Montgomery JW; Evans JL; Fargo JD; Schwartz S; Gillam RB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 61(12):2950-2976. PubMed ID: 30398612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory.
    Vos SH; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 16(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 12589896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis.
    Key-DeLyria SE; Rogalski Y; Bodner T; Weichselbaum A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Sep; 57(5):990-1005. PubMed ID: 35611868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Do We Segment Text? Two-Stage Chunking Operation in Reading.
    Yang 杨金骉 J; Cai 蔡清 Q; Tian 田兴 X
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 32393584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salience-weighted agreement feature hierarchy modulates language comprehension.
    Muralikrishnan R; Idrissi A
    Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():168-189. PubMed ID: 34058618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.
    Gattei CA; Dickey MW; Wainselboim AJ; París L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1981-2007. PubMed ID: 25529525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation between working memory and language comprehension in signers and speakers.
    Emmorey K; Giezen MR; Petrich JAF; Spurgeon E; O'Grady Farnady L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():69-77. PubMed ID: 28477456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.