154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3786775)
1. Economic impact of low-osmolality contrast agents on radiology procedures and departments.
Evens RG
Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):267-8. PubMed ID: 3786775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
Evens RG
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Indications for the use of low-osmolar contrast agents.
Bloom DM
Physician Exec; 1989; 15(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10313370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High and low osmolar contrast media: who pays?
Göthlin JH
Eur J Radiol; 1988 May; 8(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 3383859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare program--reimbursement for radiological services furnished to a hospital inpatient by a physician in the field of radiology: proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1979 Jan; 44(18):5162-3. PubMed ID: 10297327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonionic contrast agents: clinical and cost considerations.
Wolf G
Radiol Manage; 1986 Jul; 8(3):66-8. PubMed ID: 10311703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Management budgeting for radiographers.
Gray I
Radiography; 1986; 52(606):295-8. PubMed ID: 3628747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment.
Steinberg EP; Anderson GF; Powe NR; Sakin JW; Kinnison ML; Neuman P; White RI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 3260719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New dyes' higher costs cause controversy.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):45. PubMed ID: 10291656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to "price" X rays.
Groth CD
Med Group Manage; 1980; 27(4):12-6. PubMed ID: 10247673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Materials management for the radiology department.
Hosp Purch Manage; 1979 May; 4(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 10241164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring financial and productivity performance in radiology departments.
Danco W
Radiol Manage; 1980 Apr; 2(3):42-6. PubMed ID: 10246480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The costs of X rays.
Stilwell JA
Br J Radiol; 1984 Jul; 57(679):647-9. PubMed ID: 6733412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast medium-induced adverse reactions: economic outcome.
Powe NR; Steinberg EP; Erickson JE; Moore RD; Smith CR; White RI; Brinker JA; Fishman EK; Zinreich SJ; Kinnison ML
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 3420254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Silver: a futures commodity for hospitals.
HBI Rep; 1979; 1(6):11. PubMed ID: 10245701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. High radiology losses related to invasive procedures.
Bowyer EA
Radiol Manage; 1986 Jan; 8(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 10275994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Silver recovery: $2 billion yearly savings possible.
Simler SL
Mod Healthc; 1980 Apr; 10(4):37. PubMed ID: 10324095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiology in a rural hospital.
de Rhoter W
Trop Doct; 1985 Jan; 15(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 3976004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An institutional approach to developing guidelines for the use of low-osmolality contrast agents.
Swanson DP
Appl Radiol; 1988 May; 17(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 10287384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
