These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37867793)

  • 41. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) model; impacts and sustainable investment - Global trends and Poland's perspective.
    Dmuchowski P; Dmuchowski W; Baczewska-Dąbrowska AH; Gworek B
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 329():117023. PubMed ID: 36571952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Identifying the nexus among environmental performance, digital finance, and green innovation: New evidence from prefecture-level cities in China.
    Hao Y; Wang C; Yan G; Irfan M; Chang CP
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jun; 335():117554. PubMed ID: 36863147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings.
    Liu M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():936798. PubMed ID: 35992419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Understanding the nexus between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and financial performance: evidence from Chinese-listed companies.
    Zhou R; Hou J; Ding F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(29):73231-73253. PubMed ID: 37184789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Can companies get more government subsidies through improving their ESG performance? Empirical evidence from China.
    Zhang X; Zhang J; Feng Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292355. PubMed ID: 37788255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dynamic Capabilities and an ESG Strategy for Sustainable Management Performance.
    Liang Y; Lee MJ; Jung JS
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():887776. PubMed ID: 35719473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Understanding the dynamics of capital structure, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility in high- and low-leveraged US and Chinese firms.
    Mahmood AN; Arslan HM; Younas ZI; Komal B; Ali K; Mubeen M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46204-46221. PubMed ID: 36710308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Environmental, Social, Governance Risk and Corporate Sustainable Growth Nexus: Quantile Regression Approach.
    Teng X; Wang Y; Wang A; Chang BG; Wu KS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Exploring the Relationship Between ESG Performance and Green Bond Issuance.
    Wang S; Wang D
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():897577. PubMed ID: 35692317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Linkage Between Inclusive Digital Finance and High-Tech Enterprise Innovation Performance: Role of Debt and Equity Financing.
    Han H; Gu X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():814408. PubMed ID: 35027906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can digital finance reduce carbon emission intensity? A perspective based on factor allocation distortions: evidence from Chinese cities.
    Yang G; Ding Z; Wu M; Gao M; Yue Z; Wang H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):38832-38852. PubMed ID: 36586024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Does sustainability activities performance matter during financial crises? Investigating the case of COVID-19.
    Yoo S; Keeley AR; Managi S
    Energy Policy; 2021 Aug; 155():112330. PubMed ID: 35722223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Digital finance and regional green innovation: evidence from Chinese cities.
    Meng F; Zhang W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(59):89498-89521. PubMed ID: 35854068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Corporate sustainability performance, stock returns, and ESG indicators: fresh insights from EU member states.
    Ye C; Song X; Liang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(58):87680-87691. PubMed ID: 35819677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of political turnover on corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China.
    Yang C; Hao W; Song D
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288789. PubMed ID: 37486926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Whether Green Finance Improves Green Innovation of Listed Companies-Evidence from China.
    Dong Z; Xu H; Zhang Z; Lyu Y; Lu Y; Duan H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Does the development of digital finance curb carbon emissions? Evidence from county data in China.
    Chu H; Yu H; Chong Y; Li L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(17):49237-49254. PubMed ID: 36773252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital finance and innovation inequality: evidence from green technological innovation in China.
    Feng S; Chong Y; Li G; Zhang S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(58):87884-87900. PubMed ID: 35819670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The dynamic impact of digital finance on green innovation: evidence enterprise-level empirical data in China.
    Wang J; Wang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(53):113424-113441. PubMed ID: 37851250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does digital finance promote the "quantity" and "quality" of green innovation? A dynamic spatial Durbin econometric analysis.
    Chen J; Zhu D; Ren X; Luo W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(28):72588-72606. PubMed ID: 37178291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.