137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37869125)
1. Variability of Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography in a Phantom Model.
Lee J; Yoon SK; Cho JH; Kwon HJ; Kim DW; Lee JW
J Korean Soc Radiol; 2023 Sep; 84(5):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 37869125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of commercial and non-commercial shear wave elastography implementations for vascular applications.
Pruijssen JT; Schreuder FHBM; Wilbers J; Kaanders JHAM; de Korte CL; Hansen HHG
Ultrasonics; 2024 May; 140():107312. PubMed ID: 38599075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of shear wave elastography among operators, machines, and probes in an elasticity phantom.
Alrashed AI; Alfuraih AM
Ultrasonography; 2021 Jan; 40(1):158-166. PubMed ID: 32660213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study.
Shin HJ; Kim MJ; Kim HY; Roh YH; Lee MJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3361-7. PubMed ID: 26815368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study.
Chen Q; Shi B; Zheng Y; Hu X
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():943844. PubMed ID: 36004380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining the optimal technique for endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography: a combined benchtop and animal model study with comparison to transabdominal shear wave elastography.
Wang TJ; Ryou M
Clin Endosc; 2023 Mar; 56(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 36849118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of Strain and 2D Shear Wave Elastography - a phantom study.
Dudea-Simon M; Dudea SM; Schiau C; Ciortea R; Măluțan A; Simon V; Burde A; Ciurea A; Mihu D
Med Ultrason; 2021 Nov; 23(4):430-437. PubMed ID: 34113934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and inter-observer variation and accuracy using different shear wave elastography methods to assess circumscribed objects - a phantom study.
Seliger G; Chaoui K; Kunze C; Dridi Y; Jenderka KV; Wienke A; Tchirikov M
Med Ultrason; 2017 Nov; 19(4):357-365. PubMed ID: 29197911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sources of Variability in Shear Wave Speed and Dispersion Quantification with Ultrasound Elastography: A Phantom Study.
Korta Martiartu N; Nambiar S; Nascimento Kirchner I; Paverd C; Cester D; Frauenfelder T; Ruby L; Rominger MB
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Dec; 47(12):3529-3542. PubMed ID: 34548187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Assessment of the Liver: A Direct Comparison With Point Shear Wave Elastography in Healthy Volunteers.
Fang C; Konstantatou E; Romanos O; Yusuf GT; Quinlan DJ; Sidhu PS
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 28370146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear wave elastography using ultrasound: effects of anisotropy and stretch stress on a tissue phantom and
Lee HY; Lee JH; Shin JH; Kim SY; Shin HJ; Park JS; Choi YJ; Baek JH
Ultrasonography; 2017 Jan; 36(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 27459989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography within muscles using different region of interest sizes, manufacturers, probes and acquisition angles: an
Wang X; Zhu J; Gao J; Hu Y; Liu Y; Li W; Chen S; Liu F
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jun; 12(6):3227-3237. PubMed ID: 35655847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Novel Elastography Phantom Prototype for Assessment of Ultrasound Elastography Imaging Performance.
Al-Mutairi FF; Chung EM; Moran CM; Ramnarine KV
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 47(9):2749-2758. PubMed ID: 34144833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of the pancreas: measurement success rate, repeatability, and factors affecting measurement values.
Zhuo M; Zhang X; Tang Y; Yan Y; Chen Z
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2022 Apr; 49(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 35312874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear wave speed measurement bias in a viscoelastic phantom across six ultrasound elastography systems: a comparative study with transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography.
Kishimoto R; Suga M; Usumura M; Iijima H; Yoshida M; Hachiya H; Shiina T; Yamakawa M; Konno K; Obata T; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2022 Apr; 49(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 35061118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional vs. two-dimensional shear-wave elastography of the testes - preliminary study on a healthy collective.
Marcon J; Trottmann M; Rübenthaler J; D'Anastasi M; Stief CG; Reiser MF; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016; 64(3):447-456. PubMed ID: 27886002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal liver stiffness in healthy adults assessed by real-time shear wave elastography and factors that influence this method.
Huang Z; Zheng J; Zeng J; Wang X; Wu T; Zheng R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 40(11):2549-55. PubMed ID: 25282481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reproducibility of shear wave elastography according to the size and elasticity of lesions: A phantom study.
Kim H; Kim H; Han BK; Choi JS; Ko ES; Ko EY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Oct; 101(41):e31095. PubMed ID: 36253983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Long Z; Tradup DJ; Song P; Stekel SF; Chen S; Glazebrook KN; Hangiandreou NJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):336-342. PubMed ID: 29542277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
