These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37869545)
21. Indirect Decompression Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Revision Surgery Following Previous Posterior Decompression: Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Direct and Indirect Decompression Revision Surgery. Park SJ; Hwang JM; Cho DC; Lee S; Kim CH; Han I; Park DW; Kwon HD; Kim KT Neurospine; 2022 Sep; 19(3):544-554. PubMed ID: 36203280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Short-Term Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Expandable and Static Interbody Spacers Following Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion. Eguchi Y; Suzuki N; Orita S; Inage K; Narita M; Shiga Y; Inoue M; Toshi N; Tokeshi S; Okuyama K; Ohyama S; Maki S; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Hagiwara S; Kawarai Y; Akazawa T; Koda M; Takahashi H; Ohtori S World Neurosurg; 2024 May; 185():e1144-e1152. PubMed ID: 38493893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Fujibayashi S; Hynes RA; Otsuki B; Kimura H; Takemoto M; Matsuda S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):E175-82. PubMed ID: 25394317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Disease With Neurologic Deficits: Comparison Between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Kang GH; Son D; Lee JS; Lee SH; Bae SH; Lee SW; Song GS Korean J Neurotrauma; 2022 Oct; 18(2):277-286. PubMed ID: 36381439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Ge T; Ao J; Li G; Lang Z; Sun Y J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 16(1):584. PubMed ID: 34635143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Ideal Cage Position for Achieving Both Indirect Neural Decompression and Segmental Angle Restoration in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF). Park SJ; Lee CS; Chung SS; Kang SS; Park HJ; Kim SH Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E784-E790. PubMed ID: 27352372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Khalifeh JM; Massie LW; Dibble CF; Dorward IG; Macki M; Khandpur U; Alshohatee K; Jain D; Chang V; Ray WZ Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(8):E439-E449. PubMed ID: 33979102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: A STROBE-compliant study. Zhu G; Hao Y; Yu L; Cai Y; Yang X Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12680. PubMed ID: 30290656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Gao QY; Wei FL; Li T; Zhu KL; Du MR; Heng W; Yang F; Gao HR; Qian JX; Zhou CP Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():829426. PubMed ID: 35665352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative Study of the Difference of Perioperative Complication and Radiologic Results: MIS-DLIF (Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion) Versus MIS-OLIF (Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion). Jin J; Ryu KS; Hur JW; Seong JH; Kim JS; Cho HJ Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 28059946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do Radiographic Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Vary with Cage Position in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Diseases? Ding Q; Tang X; Zhang R; Wu H; Liu C Orthop Surg; 2022 Apr; 14(4):730-741. PubMed ID: 35302296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the location of intervertebral cages during oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery to achieve sagittal correction. Shiga Y; Orita S; Inage K; Sato J; Fujimoto K; Kanamoto H; Abe K; Kubota G; Yamauchi K; Eguchi Y; Inoue M; Kinoshita H; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Hynes R; Furuya T; Koda M; Takahashi K; Ohtori S Spine Surg Relat Res; 2017; 1(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 31440634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases. Zhao L; Xie T; Wang X; Yang Z; Pu X; Lu Y; Song Y; Zeng J Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 34906739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Early effect of standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with lateral screw fixation of the vertebral body on single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: A pilot study. Qiu MG; Zhou SG; Lin SS; Hu X; Lin C; Lin KF J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2023; 36(3):709-719. PubMed ID: 36565101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Direct Versus Indirect Decompression with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis. Lin GX; Akbary K; Kotheeranurak V; Quillo-Olvera J; Jo HJ; Yang XW; Mahatthanatrakul A; Kim JS World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e898-e909. PubMed ID: 30099187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]