These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37870825)

  • 1. Exploring the response code in a compatibility effect between physical size and left/right responses: The hand is more important than location.
    Seegelke C; Richter M; Heed T; Wühr P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1485-1502. PubMed ID: 37870825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handedness and effector strength modulate a compatibility effect between stimulus size and response position with manual and vocal responses.
    Wühr P; Richter M; Seegelke C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Mar; 50(3):263-279. PubMed ID: 38421774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations between physical size and space are strongly asymmetrical.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):16256. PubMed ID: 37759068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separate processing mechanisms for spatial-numerical compatibility and numerical-size congruity.
    Vellan JE; Leth-Steensen C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 35143238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Different grasping experiences affect mapping effects but not correspondence effects between stimulus size and response location.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38940821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1003-17. PubMed ID: 15675647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The brain's fingers and hands.
    Haggard P; Kitadono K; Press C; Taylor-Clarke M
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 16369787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of hand and finger location in external spatial coordinates for tactile localization.
    Heed T; Backhaus J; Röder B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):386-401. PubMed ID: 21688947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pointing hand stimuli induce spatial compatibility effects and effector priming.
    Nishimura A; Michimata C
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():219. PubMed ID: 23637688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disentangling the External Reference Frames Relevant to Tactile Localization.
    Heed T; Backhaus J; Röder B; Badde S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158829. PubMed ID: 27391805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: evidence for a hand referent hypothesis.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1301-15. PubMed ID: 12519027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect.
    Medina J; McCloskey M; Coslett HB; Rapp B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2131-42. PubMed ID: 25243674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How visual experience and task context modulate the use of internal and external spatial coordinate for perception and action.
    Crollen V; Spruyt T; Mahau P; Bottini R; Collignon O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 30730176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline.
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Luppino G; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):664-73. PubMed ID: 6218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple spatial representations determine touch localization on the fingers.
    Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):784-801. PubMed ID: 24364704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When left feels right: asymmetry in the affordance effect.
    Janyan A; Slavcheva GV
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S199-202. PubMed ID: 22806648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The coding of repetitions and alternations in action sequences: spatial or relational?
    Wühr P; Heuer H
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):432-45. PubMed ID: 24908075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mental representation of nonnumerical quantifiers: The Spatial-Linguistic Association of Response Codes (SLARC) effect.
    Abbondanza M; Rinaldi L; Foppolo F; Marelli M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Dec; 47(12):2021-2028. PubMed ID: 34582237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.