These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37872114)

  • 1. Genomic prediction of pig growth traits based on machine learning.
    Chen D; Wang SJ; Zhao ZJ; Ji X; Shen Q; Yu Y; Cui SD; Wang JG; Chen ZY; Wang JY; Guo ZY; Wu PX; Tang GQ
    Yi Chuan; 2023 Oct; 45(10):922-932. PubMed ID: 37872114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods and variable selection methods for predicting difficult-to-measure traits in Holstein dairy cattle using milk infrared spectral data.
    Mota LFM; Pegolo S; Baba T; Peñagaricano F; Morota G; Bittante G; Cecchinato A
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):8107-8121. PubMed ID: 33865589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using machine learning to realize genetic site screening and genomic prediction of productive traits in pigs.
    Xiang T; Li T; Li J; Li X; Wang J
    FASEB J; 2023 Jun; 37(6):e22961. PubMed ID: 37178007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
    Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits.
    Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation.
    Badke YM; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Fix J; Steibel JP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 24531728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.
    Liu T; Luo C; Wang J; Ma J; Shu D; Lund MS; Su G; Qu H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173620. PubMed ID: 28278209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of genomic prediction for growth and carcass traits in Chinese triple-yellow chickens.
    Liu T; Qu H; Luo C; Shu D; Wang J; Lund MS; Su G
    BMC Genet; 2014 Oct; 15():110. PubMed ID: 25316160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic prediction based on runs of homozygosity.
    Luan T; Yu X; Dolezal M; Bagnato A; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):64. PubMed ID: 25284459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values Using a Subset of SNPs Identified by Three Machine Learning Methods.
    Li B; Zhang N; Wang YG; George AW; Reverter A; Li Y
    Front Genet; 2018; 9():237. PubMed ID: 30023001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.
    Hollifield MK; Lourenco D; Bermann M; Howard JT; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Apr; 99(4):. PubMed ID: 33733277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.
    Bussiman F; Chen CY; Holl J; Bermann M; Legarra A; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37584978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.