188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37872798)
1. The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility.
Gaissmaier W; Tiede KE; Garcia-Retamero R
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):774-788. PubMed ID: 37872798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
Gaissmaier W; Wegwarth O; Skopec D; Müller AS; Broschinski S; Politi MC
Health Psychol; 2012 May; 31(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 21842998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy.
van Weert JCM; Alblas MC; van Dijk L; Jansen J
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Jan; 104(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 32727670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Guiding Toward Task-Relevant Information Help Improve Graph Processing and Graph Comprehension of Individuals with Low or High Numeracy? An Eye-Tracker Experiment.
Keller C; Junghans A
Med Decis Making; 2017 Nov; 37(8):942-954. PubMed ID: 28618918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
Scalia P; Schubbe DC; Lu ES; Durand MA; Frascara J; Noel G; O'Malley AJ; Elwyn G
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253644. PubMed ID: 34297713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools.
Nayak JG; Hartzler AL; Macleod LC; Izard JP; Dalkin BM; Gore JL
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Mar; 99(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 26481910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.
Dowding D; Merrill JA; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Rosati RJ; Russell D
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Feb; 25(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28460091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.
Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ
Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Level of Numeracy and Graph Literacy Impact Comprehension of Quality Targets? Findings from a Survey of Home Care Nurses.
Dowding DW; Russell D; Jonas K; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Merrill RJA; Rosati RJ
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():635-640. PubMed ID: 29854128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Graphical and numerical skills in pre- and postgraduate medical students from a private university].
Mas G; Tello T; Ortiz P; Petrova D; García-Retamero R
Gac Med Mex; 2018; 154(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 29733061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison.
Galesic M; Garcia-Retamero R
Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):444-57. PubMed ID: 20671213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates.
Brown SM; Culver JO; Osann KE; MacDonald DJ; Sand S; Thornton AA; Grant M; Bowen DJ; Metcalfe KA; Burke HB; Robson ME; Friedman S; Weitzel JN
Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Apr; 83(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 20554149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.
Hawley ST; Zikmund-Fisher B; Ubel P; Jancovic A; Lucas T; Fagerlin A
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 18755566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When Does the Incremental Risk Format Aid Informed Medical Decisions? The Role of Learning, Feedback, and Number of Treatment Options.
Tiede KE; Ripke F; Degen N; Gaissmaier W
Med Decis Making; 2020 Feb; 40(2):212-221. PubMed ID: 32036764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population.
Durand MA; Yen RW; O'Malley J; Elwyn G; Mancini J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241844. PubMed ID: 33175891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].
Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
Soc Sci Med; 2010 Apr; 70(7):1019-25. PubMed ID: 20116159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
