These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37873409)

  • 21. How should we evaluate the risk of bias of physical therapy trials?: a psychometric and meta-epidemiological approach towards developing guidelines for the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs in Physical Therapy (PT) area: a study protocol.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Fuentes J; Rogers T; Hartling L; Saltaji H; Cummings GG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():88. PubMed ID: 24070072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identifying additional studies for a systematic review of retention strategies in randomised controlled trials: making contact with trials units and trial methodologists.
    Brueton V; Tierney JF; Stenning S; Rait G
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):167. PubMed ID: 28830570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.
    Marshall M; Crowther R; Almaraz-Serrano A; Creed F; Sledge W; Kluiter H; Roberts C; Hill E; Wiersma D; Bond GR; Huxley P; Tyrer P
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(21):1-75. PubMed ID: 11532238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methodological quality assessment criteria for the evaluation of laboratory-based studies included in systematic reviews within the specialty of Endodontology: A development protocol.
    Nagendrababu V; Abbott PV; Boutsioukis C; Duncan HF; Faggion CM; Kishen A; Murray PE; Pulikkotil SJ; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2022 Apr; 55(4):326-333. PubMed ID: 35043398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey.
    MacLennan S; Bekema HJ; Williamson PR; Campbell MK; Stewart F; MacLennan SJ; N'Dow JM; Lam TB
    Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():76. PubMed ID: 25887437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Participatory development of a framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in conducting a systematic review: the DECIDE-SR protocol.
    Rommerskirch-Manietta M; Manietta C; Hoffmann AL; Rohra H; Gove D; Alpers B; Hung L; Geary CR; Abbott KM; Ren LH; Oberfeld S; Diaz A; Roes M
    Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Jul; 9(1):52. PubMed ID: 37434210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews.
    Moher D; Pham B; Lawson ML; Klassen TP
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(41):1-90. PubMed ID: 14670218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Tricco AC; Gates M; Gates A; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):335. PubMed ID: 31870434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening for prostate cancer.
    Ilic D; Neuberger MM; Djulbegovic M; Dahm P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jan; 2013(1):CD004720. PubMed ID: 23440794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.
    Fordham B; Sugavanam T; Edwards K; Hemming K; Howick J; Copsey B; Lee H; Kaidesoja M; Kirtley S; Hopewell S; das Nair R; Howard R; Stallard P; Hamer-Hunt J; Cooper Z; Lamb SE
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Feb; 25(9):1-378. PubMed ID: 33629950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Network meta-analysis of randomised trials of pharmacological, psychotherapeutic, exercise and collaborative care interventions for depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease: hybrid systematic review of systematic reviews protocol.
    Doyle F; Freedland K; Carney R; de Jonge P; Dickens C; Pedersen S; Sorensen J; Dempster M
    Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 8(1):71. PubMed ID: 30878039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke.
    Pollock A; Farmer SE; Brady MC; Langhorne P; Mead GE; Mehrholz J; van Wijck F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 2014(11):CD010820. PubMed ID: 25387001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: protocol for a scoping review.
    Selman CJ; Lee KJ; Whitehead CL; Manley BJ; Mahar RK
    Trials; 2023 Apr; 24(1):286. PubMed ID: 37085929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.
    Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Yamamoto K; Furukawa TA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017411. PubMed ID: 28827269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol.
    Hollis JL; Doherty E; Dray J; Tremain D; Hunter M; Takats K; Williams CM; Murray H; Pennell CE; Tully B; Wiggers J; Daly JB; Kingsland M
    Syst Rev; 2020 Sep; 9(1):204. PubMed ID: 32878647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review.
    Andreas M; Iannizzi C; Bohndorf E; Monsef I; Piechotta V; Meerpohl JJ; Skoetz N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 8(8):CD015270. PubMed ID: 35920693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 30670086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bias due to MEasurement Reactions In Trials to improve health (MERIT): protocol for research to develop MRC guidance.
    Miles LM; Elbourne D; Farmer A; Gulliford M; Locock L; McCambridge J; Sutton S; French DP
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):653. PubMed ID: 30477551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.