These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37874074)

  • 1. Assessment of CBCT gray value in different regions-of-interest and fields-of-view compared to Hounsfield unit.
    Yadegari A; Safi Y; Shahbazi S; Yaghoutiazar S; Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230187. PubMed ID: 37874074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of field-of-view size on gray values derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with the Hounsfield unit values from multidetector computed tomography scans.
    Shokri A; Ramezani L; Bidgoli M; Akbarzadeh M; Ghazikhanlu-Sani K; Fallahi-Sichani H
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Mar; 48(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 29581947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.
    Bastami F; Shahab S; Parsa A; Abbas FM; Noori Kooshki MH; Namdari M; Lisar HA; Rafiei T; Fahimipour F; Salehi M; Jafari M
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 29086089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the accuracy of bone mineral density using a multisource CBCT.
    Hu Y; Xu S; Li B; Inscoe CR; Tyndall DA; Lee YZ; Lu J; Zhou O
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3887. PubMed ID: 38366012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography.
    Molteni R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 23768878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):79884780. PubMed ID: 22933535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size.
    Rodrigues AF; Campos MJ; Chaoubah A; Fraga MR; Farinazzo Vitral RW
    Implant Dent; 2015 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 25706259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study.
    Ilo AM; Ekholm M; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Waltimo-Sirén J
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):670. PubMed ID: 34965859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the assessment of the mandibular molar danger zone affected by field of view and voxel size in cone beam computed tomography examinations?
    Ferrari DR; Reis TMS; Junqueira RB; Kamburoğlu K; Küçük Ö; Verner FS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Jun; 137(6):662-670. PubMed ID: 38490929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
    Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Gröndahl K
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image-based shading correction for narrow-FOV truncated pelvic CBCT with deep convolutional neural networks and transfer learning.
    Rossi M; Belotti G; Paganelli C; Pella A; Barcellini A; Cerveri P; Baroni G
    Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7112-7126. PubMed ID: 34636429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?
    Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Singer SR; Mupparapu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140238. PubMed ID: 25315442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low Bone Density Predictability of CBCT and Its Relation to Primary Stability of Tapered Implant Design: A Pilot Study.
    Lee SH; Yun PY; Yi YJ; Kim YK; Lee HJ; Jo DW
    J Oral Implantol; 2023 Oct; 49(5):556-563. PubMed ID: 35881816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images.
    Niu T; Sun M; Star-Lack J; Gao H; Fan Q; Zhu L
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5395-406. PubMed ID: 21089775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study.
    Niktash A; Mehralizadeh S; Talaeipour A
    Front Dent; 2022; 19():32. PubMed ID: 36865948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.