135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37875212)
1. Multidirectional Traction Method Using SURGICEL NU-KNIT and Surgical Suture in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.
Yamauchi K; Sekiyama K; Otsuki M; Nakamura S; Kawai E; Kojima M; Kozono Y; Okuda A; Yoshioka Y; Higuchi T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):12-13. PubMed ID: 37875212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in People With Obesity: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2023; 23(6):1-70. PubMed ID: 38026449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of uterine manipulators in endometrial cancer recurrence after laparoscopic or robotic procedures.
Iavazzo C; Gkegkes ID
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1003-9. PubMed ID: 24057065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer.
El-Achi V; Weishaupt J; Carter J; Saidi S
J Robot Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):483-487. PubMed ID: 32737804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.
Sunkara S; Guan X
Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):414-416. PubMed ID: 35691722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.
Nevis IF; Vali B; Higgins C; Dhalla I; Urbach D; Bernardini MQ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27424111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Development of a New Uterine Manipulation Method during Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Mabuchi S; Niiro E; Nagayasu M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):1000-1005. PubMed ID: 32979532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protective Maneuver to Avoid Tumor Spillage during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Vaginal Cuff Closure.
Lago V; Tiermes M; Padilla-Iserte P; Matute L; Gurrea M; Domingo S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 32540498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the use of a uterine manipulator with an intrauterine balloon in total laparoscopic hysterectomy facilitate tumor cell spillage into the peritoneal cavity in patients with endometrial cancer?
Lim S; Kim HS; Lee KB; Yoo CW; Park SY; Seo SS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(5):1145-9. PubMed ID: 18217979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the use of a uterine manipulator in robotic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer affect oncological outcomes?
Ito H; Moritake T; Isaka K
Int J Med Robot; 2022 Dec; 18(6):e2443. PubMed ID: 35856237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Aarts JW; Nieboer TE; Johnson N; Tavender E; Garry R; Mol BW; Kluivers KB
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 2015(8):CD003677. PubMed ID: 26264829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer.
Argenta PA; Mattson J; Rivard CL; Luther E; Schefter A; Vogel RI
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 May; 165(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35314086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
