These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37875244)
21. Iliac screws may not be necessary in long-segment constructs with L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: cadaveric study of stability and instrumentation strain. Hlubek RJ; Godzik J; Newcomb AGUS; Lehrman JN; de Andrada B; Bohl MA; Farber SH; Kelly BP; Turner JD Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):942-950. PubMed ID: 30419290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The rate of fusion for stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Manzur M; Virk SS; Jivanelli B; Vaishnav AS; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Iyer S; Gang CH; Qureshi S Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 30872148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Postoperative spinal alignment comparison of lateral versus supine patient position L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Khajavi K; Menezes CM; Braly BA; Thomas JA Eur Spine J; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2248-2254. PubMed ID: 35610486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion of L5-S1 using a novel implant with anterior plate fixation. Szadkowski M; d'Astorg H; Bouhali H; Aleksic I; Ramos-Pascual S; Fière V Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 32504869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adjacent segment disease. Shasti M; Koenig SJ; Nash AB; Bahrami S; Jauregui JJ; O'Hara NN; Jazini E; Gelb DE; Ludwig SC Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):545-551. PubMed ID: 30201269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction. Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adjacent Segment Reoperation and Other Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions at One and Two Levels. Martini ML; Nistal DA; Gal J; Neifert SN; Rothrock RJ; Kim JD; Deutsch BC; Genadry L; Lamb CD; Caridi JM World Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 139():e480-e488. PubMed ID: 32311547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study. Strube P; Putzier M; Streitparth F; Hoff EK; Hartwig T J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 26360146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multilevel Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: Trends, Outcomes, and Cost. Chi J; Zhang Y; Fontaine A; Zhang Z; Wang J; Labaran L; Li X Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; 37(5):E192-E200. PubMed ID: 38158597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Metal failure and nonunion at L5-S1 after long instrumented fusion distal to pelvis for adult spinal deformity: Anterior versus transforaminal interbody fusion. Park SJ; Park JS; Lee CS; Lee KH J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021; 29(3):23094990211054223. PubMed ID: 34874195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion. Louie PK; Varthi AG; Narain AS; Lei V; Bohl DD; Shifflett GD; Phillips FM Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2025-2032. PubMed ID: 29679730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. PLF Versus PLIF and the Fate of L5-S1: Analysis of Operative Nonunion Rates Among 3065 Patients with Lumbar Fusions from a Regional Spine Registry. Guppy KH; Royse KE; Norheim EP; Harris JE; Brara HS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 May; 46(10):E584-E593. PubMed ID: 33306615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1. Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical comparison: stability of lateral-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral fixation compared with anterior-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation in the lower lumbar spine. Kim SM; Lim TJ; Paterno J; Park J; Kim DH J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Jan; 2(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 15658128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct lateral approach to lumbar fusion is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the anterior approach: an in vitro study. Laws CJ; Coughlin DG; Lotz JC; Serhan HA; Hu SS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):819-25. PubMed ID: 21971125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Rods in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: A Case Series. Ormond DR; Albert L; Das K Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E371-5. PubMed ID: 23075859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]