167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37875871)
1. Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height.
Alseddiek A; Al-Zordk W; Attia A
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):784. PubMed ID: 37875871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.
Nouh I; Kern M; Sabet AE; Aboelfadl AK; Hamdy AM; Chaar MS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan; 30(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 30521070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.
Roberts EE; Bailey CW; Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL; Vandewalle KS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
Taha D; Sabet A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments.
Elsayed A; Yazigi C; Kern M; Chaar MS
Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e435-e442. PubMed ID: 33875247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of abutment design on fracture resistance of resin-matrix ceramic crowns for dental implant restoration: an in vitro study.
Lin J; Cai P; Zhuo Y; Lin L; Zheng Z
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):410. PubMed ID: 37344826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Supported by Titanium and Ti-Base Abutments: The Effect of Chewing Simulation and Thermocyclic Aging.
Yavuz A; Büyükerkmen EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):328-333. PubMed ID: 37083917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.
Yüksel M; Saygin AG; Bolayir G
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):594-601. PubMed ID: 36065985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of metal opaquer on the final color of 3 ceramic crown types on 3 abutment configurations.
Arif R; Yilmaz B; Mortazavi A; Ozcelik TB; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):375-381. PubMed ID: 29724553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wear resistance of CAD/CAM one-piece screw-retained hybrid-abutment-crowns made from different restorative materials.
Elsayed A; Chaar MS; Kern M; Libecki W; Yazigi C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 37408517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
