161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37875871)
21. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.
Emam M; Eldimeery A; Salah T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35904823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cementation Protocol for Bonding Zirconia Crowns to Titanium Base CAD/CAM Abutments.
Zahoui A; Bergamo ET; Marun MM; Silva KP; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(5):527-535. PubMed ID: 32956434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of Different CAD/CAM Crown Materials on the Fracture of Custom-Made Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments After Artificial Aging.
Elsayed A; Farrag G; Chaar MS; Abdelnabi N; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 30677119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
Mitsias M; Koutayas SO; Wolfart S; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns.
DuVall NB; DeReis SP; Vandewalle KS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):522-530. PubMed ID: 33174333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retention and Marginal Integrity of CAD/CAM Fabricated Crowns Adhesively Cemented to Titanium Base Abutments-Influence of Bonding System and Restorative Material.
Burkhardt F; Sailer I; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Pitta J
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Nov; 36(5):651. PubMed ID: 36288489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro assessment of the effect of luting agents, abutment height, and fatigue on the retention of zirconia crowns luted to titanium base implant abutments.
Strazzi-Sahyon HB; Bergamo ETP; Gierthmuehlen PC; Lopes ACO; Alves LMM; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Zahoui A; Coelho PG; de Carvalho AM; Bonfante EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):739.e1-739.e8. PubMed ID: 37684141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements.
Sellers K; Powers JM; Kiat-Amnuay S
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 27677215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the marginal adaptation and debonding strength of two types of CAD-CAM implant-supported cement-retained crowns.
Ramzy NA; Azer AS; Khamis MM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):967. PubMed ID: 38053146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results.
Cooper LF; Stanford C; Feine J; McGuire M
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26831919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of monolithic restorative materials on the implant-abutment interface of hybrid abutment crowns: An in vitro investigation.
Graf T; Schweiger J; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Schubert O; Güth JF
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):450-459. PubMed ID: 36517017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
Müller L; Rauch A; Reissmann DR; Schierz O
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Strength of implant-supported lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations after thermomechanical aging.
Gil A; Eliades G; Özcan M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Ioannidis A
Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 36632986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of different combinations of CAD-CAM crown and customized abutment materials on the force absorption capacity in implant supported restorations - In vitro study.
Taha D; Cesar PF; Sabet A
Dent Mater; 2022 Jan; 38(1):e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34952710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.
Obermeier M; Ristow O; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):981-991. PubMed ID: 28710653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
