These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37875873)

  • 1. Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yu Q; Lu HG; Pan XK; Shen ZH; Ren P; Hu XQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Oct; 24(1):838. PubMed ID: 37875873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han H; Song Y; Li Y; Zhou H; Fu Y; Li J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 18(1):656. PubMed ID: 37667363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].
    Kong F; Zhou Q; Qiao Y; Wang W; Zhang C; Pan Q; Zhu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 36(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 35570634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion verse 3D microscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 24-month follow-up.
    Guo W; Li T; Feng C; Yu Y; Hu Y; Fan X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):943. PubMed ID: 38066527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the efficacy and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic fusion versus minimally invasive fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and mate-analysis.
    Wang Q; Chang S; Dong JF; Fang X; Chen Y; Zhuo C
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1345-1357. PubMed ID: 36867251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Luan H; Peng C; Liu K; Song X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Nov; 18(1):888. PubMed ID: 37993948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Yu Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Xu J; Chen Y; Fan X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 36708116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Haibier A; Yusufu A; Hang L; Abudurexiti T
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):92. PubMed ID: 38281015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcome between unilateral biportal endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective cohort study.
    Huang X; Wang W; Chen G; Guan X; Zhou Y; Tang Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):274. PubMed ID: 37038129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kou Y; Chang J; Guan X; Chang Q; Feng H
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e352-e368. PubMed ID: 34087465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang H; Cheng F; Hai Y; Liu Y; Pan A
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():1089981. PubMed ID: 36703632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Meyerding degree Ⅰ or Ⅱ single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Shu P; Wang Z; Chen G
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 36310456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Efficacy of Bilateral Decompression Using Biportal Endoscopic Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Song X; Ren Z; Cao S; Zhou W; Hao Y
    World Neurosurg; 2023 May; 173():e371-e377. PubMed ID: 36804431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Results and Complications of Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis.
    Heo DH; Lee DC; Kim HS; Park CK; Chung H
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Jan; 145():396-404. PubMed ID: 33065349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis.
    Fan Z; Wu X; Guo Z; Shen N; Chen B; Xiang H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):186. PubMed ID: 38424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis combined with intervertebral disc herniation].
    Fan Z; Wu X; Guo Z; Zhou C; Chen B; Xiang H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Sep; 37(9):1098-1105. PubMed ID: 37718422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results.
    Heo DH; Son SK; Eum JH; Park CK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E8. PubMed ID: 28760038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhu L; Cai T; Shan Y; Zhang W; Zhang L; Feng X
    Pain Physician; 2021 Sep; 24(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 34554684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.