These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37875873)

  • 21. Evaluation of the Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Conventional Fusion Operations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lin GX; Yao ZK; Zhang X; Chen CM; Rui G; Hu BS
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():55-66. PubMed ID: 35085805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Using the Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique Compared With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spine Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.
    Zheng B; Zhang XL; Li P
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2023 Jun; 24(6):e395-e401. PubMed ID: 36786763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ge M; Zhang Y; Ying H; Feng C; Li Y; Tian J; Zhao T; Shao H; Huang Y
    Int Orthop; 2022 Sep; 46(9):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 35723702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of endoscopic spine surgery and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: A meta-analysis.
    Sik Goh T; Hwan Park S; Suk Kim D; Ryu S; Min Son S; Sub Lee J
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 88():5-9. PubMed ID: 33992203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
    Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
    Rathbone J; Rackham M; Nielsen D; Lee SM; Hing W; Riar S; Scott-Young M
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1911-1926. PubMed ID: 37071155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with modified biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage. Comparative study with minimally invasive microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Heo DH; Jang JW; Park CK
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Aug; 32(8):2853-2862. PubMed ID: 37211555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Chen M; Cui J; Liu Y; Cai Z; Yang C; Liu H; Chen Y; Yao Z
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 38287376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li XY; Wang YL; Yang S; Liao CS; Li SF; Han PY; Han PF
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Sep; 143(9):5657-5670. PubMed ID: 37079105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF): a Meta analysis].
    Gao ZY; Qin J; Kang J; Song H; He XJ; Li HP; Wang D
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2016 Oct; 29(10):954-962. PubMed ID: 29285916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Li A; Li X; Zhong Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 13(1):241. PubMed ID: 30236132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparing minimally invasive with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Chen YC; Zhang L; Li EN; Ding LX; Zhang GA; Hou Y; Yuan W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(43):e17420. PubMed ID: 31651845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.