These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37876632)

  • 1. Evaluation of sperm counting accuracy on computer-assisted sperm analysis with GoldCyto® slides and glass slides.
    Akal E
    Front Vet Sci; 2023; 10():1283128. PubMed ID: 37876632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Peng N; Zou X; Li L
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of commercially available chamber slides for computer-aided analysis of human sperm.
    Dardmeh F; Heidari M; Alipour H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Apr; 67(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33375858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy Evaluation of The Depth of Six Kinds of Sperm Counting Chambers for both Manual and Computer-Aided Semen Analyses.
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Int J Fertil Steril; 2016; 9(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 26985341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Method agreement between three different chambers for comparative bull semen computer assisted sperm motility analysis.
    Basioura A; Tsousis G; Boscos C; Lymberopoulos A; Tsakmakidis I
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2020 Sep; 23(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 33006852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation.
    Gączarzewicz D
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in CASA output according to the chamber type when analyzing frozen-thawed bull sperm.
    Ibănescu I; Leiding C; Ciornei ŞG; Roșca P; Sfartz I; Drugociu D
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Mar; 166():72-9. PubMed ID: 26791331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
    Contri A; Valorz C; Faustini M; Wegher L; Carluccio A
    Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments.
    Amann RP; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2014 Jan; 81(1):5-17.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24274405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal frame rate when there were stallion sperm motility evaluations and determinations for kinematic variables using CASA-Mot analysis in different counting chambers.
    Gacem S; Bompart D; Valverde A; Catalán J; Miró J; Soler C
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2020 Dec; 223():106643. PubMed ID: 33157363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method agreement between three different chambers for comparative boar semen computer-assisted sperm analysis.
    Basioura A; Tsousis G; Boscos C; Lymberopoulos A; Tsakmakidis I
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Oct; 54 Suppl 4():41-45. PubMed ID: 31232479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-step disposable chambers for sperm concentration and motility assessment: how do they compare with the World Health Organization's recommended methods?
    Tomlinson M; Turner J; Powell G; Sakkas D
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Jan; 16(1):121-124. PubMed ID: 11139549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 8557132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of different filling method-related sperm counting chambers and structural factors of disposable chambers on sperm motility].
    Zheng LJ; Zhang JW; Peng YY; Wang HL; Zhou XM; Wang W
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Nov; 27(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 37422871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility.
    Farrell PB; Presicce GA; Brockett CC; Foote RH
    Theriogenology; 1998 Mar; 49(4):871-9. PubMed ID: 10732095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.