These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37877072)
1. Comparing accuracy of cochlear measurements on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: A step towards radiation-free cochlear implantation. Swarup A; Karakkandy V; Chappity P; Naik S; Behera SK; Parida PK; Grover M; Gupta G; Giri PP; Sarkar S; Pradhan P; Samal DK; Kallyadan Veetil A; Adhikari A; Nayak S J Otol; 2023 Oct; 18(4):208-213. PubMed ID: 37877072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear Duct Length Measurements in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Newly Developed Techniques. Taeger J; Müller-Graff FT; Ilgen L; Schendzielorz P; Hagen R; Neun T; Rak K OTO Open; 2021; 5(3):2473974X211045312. PubMed ID: 34595367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Cochlear Duct Lengths Between CT and MR Images Using an Otological Surgical Planning Software. George-Jones NA; Tolisano AM; Kutz JW; Isaacson B; Hunter JB Otol Neurotol; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e1118-e1121. PubMed ID: 32925847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of MRI to determine cochlear duct length in patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Nash R; Otero S; Lavy J Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 30465634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The imaging characteristics and prognosis of patients with cochlear implants whose cochlear nerves are not shown on MRI]. Luo JF; Chao XH; Wang RJ; Liu XM; Xu QA; Fan ZM; Xu L; Wang HB Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 56(12):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 34963216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. High resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative assessment of cochlear implant patients. Gleeson TG; Lacy PD; Bresnihan M; Gaffney R; Brennan P; Viani L J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Sep; 117(9):692-5. PubMed ID: 14561354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CHARGE syndrome and Cochlear implantation: difficulties and outcomes in the paediatric population. Birman CS; Brew JA; Gibson WP; Elliott EJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 25649713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cochlear duct length and cochlear distance on preoperative CT: imaging markers for estimating insertion depth angle of cochlear implant electrode. Oh J; Cheon JE; Park J; Choi YH; Cho YJ; Lee S; Oh SH; Shin SM; Park SW Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 33471218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-Scale deep learning framework for cochlea localization, segmentation and analysis on clinical ultra-high-resolution CT images. Heutink F; Koch V; Verbist B; van der Woude WJ; Mylanus E; Huinck W; Sechopoulos I; Caballo M Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jul; 191():105387. PubMed ID: 32109685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study. Nateghifard K; Low D; Awofala L; Srikanthan D; Kuthubutheen J; Daly M; Chan H; Irish J; Chen J; Lin V; Le TN J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):65. PubMed ID: 31753027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection. Thomas JP; Klein H; Haubitz I; Dazert S; Völter C J Pers Med; 2023 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37109019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility and value of pre-operative CT and MRI for cochlear implantation in the elderly. Keidar E; Singh J; Santiago-Rivera OJ; Wilkerson B; Babu S Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(3):102853. PubMed ID: 33460977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT-scan contouring technique allows for direct and reliable measurements of the cochlear duct length: implication in cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays. Vu TH; Perazzini C; Puechmaille M; Bachy A; Mulliez A; Boyer L; Mom T; Gabrillargues J Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 276(8):2135-2140. PubMed ID: 31011800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Radiological study of temporal bone in children with profound deafness before cochlear implant: CT vs magnetic resonance imaging]. Lam WW; Hui Y; Au DK; Chow LC; Chan FL; Yu L; Wei WI Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 37(6):440-2. PubMed ID: 12966805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT imaging-based approaches to cochlear duct length estimation-a human temporal bone study. Breitsprecher T; Dhanasingh A; Schulze M; Kipp M; Dakah RA; Oberhoffner T; Dau M; Frerich B; Weber MA; Langner S; Mlynski R; Weiss NM Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1014-1023. PubMed ID: 34463797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging Modality of Choice for Pre-Operative Cochlear Imaging: HRCT vs. MRI Temporal Bone. Digge P; Solanki RN; Shah DC; Vishwakarma R; Kumar S J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Oct; 10(10):TC01-TC04. PubMed ID: 27891421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic Measurement of Cochlear Duct Length in an Indian Cadaveric Population - Importance of Custom Fit Cochlear Implant Electrodes. Singh A; Kumar R; Manchanda S; Bhalla AS; Sagar P; Irugu DVK Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 24(4):e492-e495. PubMed ID: 33101517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI versus CT in assessment of cochlear patency in cochlear implant candidates. Bettman R; Beek E; Van Olphen A; Zonneveld F; Huizing E Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jun; 124(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 15267175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in adult and pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Tamplen M; Schwalje A; Lustig L; Alemi AS; Miller ME Laryngoscope; 2016 Jun; 126(6):1440-5. PubMed ID: 26360798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]