151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37877574)
1. The dirty and clean dose concept: Towards creating proton therapy treatment plans with a photon-like dose response.
Heuchel L; Hahn C; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):622-636. PubMed ID: 37877574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment-related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors.
Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Witt Nyström P; Traneus E; Dasu A
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 31705671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of range uncertainty on clinical distributions of linear energy transfer and biological effectiveness in proton therapy.
Hahn C; Eulitz J; Peters N; Wohlfahrt P; Enghardt W; Richter C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6151-6162. PubMed ID: 33118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative analysis of dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET
Rana S; Traneus E; Jackson M; Tran L; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3444-3456. PubMed ID: 35194809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of breathing motion and a variable relative biological effectiveness in proton therapy of left-sided breast cancer.
Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Eriksson K; Flejmer AM; Dasu A
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1428-1436. PubMed ID: 28826308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios.
Giovannini G; Böhlen T; Cabal G; Bauer J; Tessonnier T; Frey K; Debus J; Mairani A; Parodi K
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():68. PubMed ID: 27185038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy.
Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Dahle TJ; Dale JE; Engeseth GM; Stokkevåg CH; Thörnqvist S; Ytre-Hauge KS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185013. PubMed ID: 30102240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose averaged linear energy transfer optimization for large sacral chordomas in carbon ion therapy.
Schafasand M; Resch AF; Nachankar A; Góra J; Martino G; Traneus E; Glimelius L; Georg D; Fossati P; Carlino A; Stock M
Med Phys; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38696546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 32542711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interlaced proton grid therapy - Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions.
Henry T; Ödén J
Phys Med; 2018 Dec; 56():81-89. PubMed ID: 30473384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy.
Chen Y; Grassberger C; Li J; Hong TS; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(19):195001. PubMed ID: 30183674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporation of relative biological effectiveness uncertainties into proton plan robustness evaluation.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):769-778. PubMed ID: 28464736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating variable RBE in IMPT optimization for ependymoma.
Goudarzi HM; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14207. PubMed ID: 37985962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. LET-weighted doses effectively reduce biological variability in proton radiotherapy planning.
McMahon SJ; Paganetti H; Prise KM
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(22):225009. PubMed ID: 30412471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
