143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37877574)
21. Quantifying Systematic RBE-Weighted Dose Uncertainty Arising from Multiple Variable RBE Models in Organ at Risk.
Koh WYC; Tan HQ; Ng YY; Lin YH; Ang KW; Lew WS; Lee JCL; Park SY
Adv Radiat Oncol; 2022; 7(2):100844. PubMed ID: 35036633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reformulated McNamara RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Gu W; Ruan D; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2136-2149. PubMed ID: 35181892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.
Cao W; Khabazian A; Yepes PP; Lim G; Poenisch F; Grosshans DR; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015013. PubMed ID: 29131808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk.
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald SM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 27986346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.
Zeng C; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Goldberg S; Niemierko A; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Trofimov A
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051708. PubMed ID: 23635256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
An Y; Shan J; Patel SH; Wong W; Schild SE; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6138-6147. PubMed ID: 28976574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.
Carabe A; Moteabbed M; Depauw N; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1159-72. PubMed ID: 22330133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.
Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Craft D; Niemierko A; Trofimov A; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23790771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biological dose and complication probabilities for the rectum and bladder based on linear energy transfer distributions in spot scanning proton therapy of prostate cancer.
Pedersen J; Petersen JBB; Stokkevåg CH; Ytre-Hauge KS; Flampouri S; Li Z; Mendenhall N; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 29037095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relating the proton relative biological effectiveness to tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities assuming interpatient variability in α/β.
Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1379-1386. PubMed ID: 28918679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of Multiple Beams on Plan Quality, Linear Energy Transfer Distribution, and Plan Robustness of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Chen Z; Wang X; Yuan C; Jin X; Liu C
ACS Sens; 2021 Feb; 6(2):408-417. PubMed ID: 33125211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automated Robust Proton Planning Using Dose-Volume Histogram-Based Mimicking of the Photon Reference Dose and Reducing Organ at Risk Dose Optimization.
Kierkels RGJ; Fredriksson A; Both S; Langendijk JA; Scandurra D; Korevaar EW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jan; 103(1):251-258. PubMed ID: 30145392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implementation of spot scanning dose optimization and dose calculation for helium ions in Hyperion.
Fuchs H; Alber M; Schreiner T; Georg D
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5157-66. PubMed ID: 26328967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incorporation of the LETd-weighted biological dose in the evaluation of breast intensity-modulated proton therapy plans.
Liu C; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Mailhot Vega RB; Zhang Y; Indelicato DJ; Mendenhall N; Liang X
Acta Oncol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):252-259. PubMed ID: 33063569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton relative biological effectiveness associated with anterior-oblique beams.
Underwood TS; Voog JC; Moteabbed M; Tang S; Soffen E; Cahlon O; Lu HM; Zietman AL; Efstathiou JA; Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 28075206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of beam pruning techniques on LET and RBE in proton arc therapy.
Henjum H; Tjelta J; Fjæra LF; Pilskog S; Stokkevåg CH; Lyngholm E; Handeland AH; Ytre-Hauge KS
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1155310. PubMed ID: 37731633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variance-based sensitivity analysis for uncertainties in proton therapy: A framework to assess the effect of simultaneous uncertainties in range, positioning, and RBE model predictions on RBE-weighted dose distributions.
Hofmaier J; Dedes G; Carlson DJ; Parodi K; Belka C; Kamp F
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):805-818. PubMed ID: 33210739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
