144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37877837)
1. The "Minimal-Touch" Technique for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: Description and Outcomes.
Ziegelmann MJ; Hebert KJ; Linder BJ; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
Urol Res Pract; 2023 Jan; 49(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 37877837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival.
Srivastava A; Joice GA; Patel HD; Manka MG; Sopko NA; Wright EJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):887-893. PubMed ID: 29545058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Initial Transcorporal Versus Standard Placement of Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Patients With Prior Radiation.
Miller D; Pekala K; Zhang X; Orikogbo O; Rogers D; Fuller TW; Maganty A; Rusilko P
Cureus; 2022 May; 14(5):e25519. PubMed ID: 35800826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of artificial urinary sphincter outcomes after primary implantation and first revision surgery.
Hebert KJ; Linder BJ; Morrisson GT; Latuche LR; Elliott DS
Asian J Urol; 2021 Jul; 8(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 34401337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications and Interventions in Patients with an Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Long-Term Results.
Radomski SB; Ruzhynsky V; Wallis CJD; Herschorn S
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 29940253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.
Linder BJ; Piotrowski JT; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):716-20. PubMed ID: 25776908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single perineal incision for artificial urinary sphincter: analysis of technique, outcomes, and experience.
Punjani N; Chan E; Chan G; Abed H; Campbell J; Brock G
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Oct; 9(5):1912-1919. PubMed ID: 33209655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement of artificial urinary sphincter in children and simultaneous gastrocystoplasty.
Holmes NM; Kogan BA; Baskin LS
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 2):2366-8. PubMed ID: 11371944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Male Patients with Spina Bifida: Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes between Bulbar Urethra and Bladder Neck Cuff Placement.
Khene ZE; Paret F; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Prudhomme T; Hascoet J; Nedelec M; Kerdraon J; Menard H; Jezequel M; Le Normand L; Manunta A; Game X; Peyronnet B
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):791-797. PubMed ID: 29037862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Mechanical Failures-Is it Better to Replace the Entire Device or Just the Malfunctioning Component?
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1523-1528. PubMed ID: 26493494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Prior Radiation Therapy on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Device Survival.
Rivera ME; Linder BJ; Ziegelmann MJ; Viers BR; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 1):1033-7. PubMed ID: 26518111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential risk factors and outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion.
Vainrib M; Simma-Chiang V; Boyd SD; Ginsberg DA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Sep; 32(7):1010-3. PubMed ID: 23595916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the fate of artificial urinary sphincters among men undergoing repetitive bladder cancer treatment?
Heiner SM; Viers BR; Rivera ME; Linder BJ; Elliott DS
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 29333514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can time to failure predict the faulty component in artificial urinary sphincter device malfunctions?
Yang DY; Linder BJ; Miller AR; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
Int J Urol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):146-150. PubMed ID: 29178540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Indiana experience with artificial urinary sphincters in children and young adults.
Herndon CD; Rink RC; Shaw MB; Simmons GR; Cain MP; Kaefer M; Casale AJ
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):650-4; discussion 654. PubMed ID: 12544336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement in octogenarians.
Ziegelmann MJ; Linder BJ; Rivera ME; Viers BR; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
Int J Urol; 2016 May; 23(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 26890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and results.
Magera JS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1015-9; discussion 1019-20. PubMed ID: 17296400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
