These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37878155)

  • 1. It's SNARC o' clock: manipulating the salience of the context in a conceptual replication of Bächtold et al.'s (1998) clockface study.
    Mingolo S; Prpic V; Mariconda A; Brugger P; Drack T; Bilotta E; Agostini T; Murgia M
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):837-851. PubMed ID: 37878155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response.
    Galarraga DB; Pratt J; Cochrane BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 May; 75(5):808-817. PubMed ID: 34344248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mirror numbers activate quantity representations, but show no SNARC effect: A working memory explanation.
    Marzola G; Cohen DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Apr; 49(4):465-482. PubMed ID: 36939612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
    Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
    Tan S; Dixon P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Snarcing with a phone: The role of order in spatial-numerical associations is revealed by context and task demands.
    Mingolo S; Prpic V; Bilotta E; Fantoni C; Agostini T; Murgia M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1365-1377. PubMed ID: 34766820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Ito Y; Hatta T
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):662-73. PubMed ID: 15478760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.