137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37879315)
21. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Trent V; Khurana KK; Pisharodi LR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):712-5. PubMed ID: 10420229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of microsatellite marker loss of heterozygosity in accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy from brush cytology samples.
Khalid A; Pal R; Sasatomi E; Swalsky P; Slivka A; Whitcomb D; Finkelstein S
Gut; 2004 Dec; 53(12):1860-5. PubMed ID: 15542529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.
Pitman MB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38190275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Diagnosing Breast Cancer.
Paul P; Azad S; Agrawal S; Rao S; Chowdhury N
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 36412573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Navaneethan U; Njei B; Lourdusamy V; Konjeti R; Vargo JJ; Parsi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 25440678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk of malignancy in the categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology.
Hoda RS; Finer EB; Arpin RN; Rosenbaum M; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(3):120-127. PubMed ID: 31097287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.
Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing.
Krishnamurthy S; Katz RL; Shumate A; Strohlein K; Khanna A; Tucker SL; Raijman I; Lahoti S
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 11391612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automated analysis of computerized morphological features of cell clusters associated with malignancy on bile duct brushing whole slide images.
Monabbati S; Leo P; Bera K; Michael CW; Nezami BG; Harbhajanka A; Madabhushi A
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):6365-6378. PubMed ID: 36281473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bile duct brushing cytology: Cytohistologic/fine-needle aspiration correlation and diagnostic pitfalls.
Selvaggi SM
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2016; 5(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 31042506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Significance of KRAS mutation testing in biliary brushing cytology specimens: A 10-year retrospective review.
Sun T; Zuo T; Hui P; Cai G
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Jul; 130(7):558-565. PubMed ID: 35417072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cytologic categorization of pancreatic neoplastic mucinous cysts with an assessment of the risk of malignancy: A retrospective study based on the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines.
Smith AL; Abdul-Karim FW; Goyal A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Apr; 124(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26618476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.
Ylagan LR; Liu LH; Maluf HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 12672095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.
Siddiqui MT; Gokaslan ST; Saboorian MH; Carrick K; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 12925981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Exfoliative cytology for diagnosing basal cell carcinoma and other skin cancers in adults.
Ferrante di Ruffano L; Dinnes J; Chuchu N; Bayliss SE; Takwoingi Y; Davenport C; Matin RN; O'Sullivan C; Roskell D; Deeks JJ; Williams HC;
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Dec; 12(12):CD013187. PubMed ID: 30521689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
