BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37879542)

  • 1. The 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) method was successfully blind-replicated by another team: a case study.
    Tufanaru C; Surian D; Scott AM; Glasziou P; Coiera E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111197. PubMed ID: 37879542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. We extended the 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) methodology to larger, more complex systematic reviews: A case series.
    Scott AM; Glasziou P; Clark J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 May; 157():112-119. PubMed ID: 36898508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study.
    Clark J; Glasziou P; Del Mar C; Bannach-Brown A; Stehlik P; Scott AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():81-90. PubMed ID: 32004673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Systematic Review Automation Tools on Methodological Quality and Time Taken to Complete Systematic Review Tasks: Case Study.
    Clark J; McFarlane C; Cleo G; Ishikawa Ramos C; Marshall S
    JMIR Med Educ; 2021 May; 7(2):e24418. PubMed ID: 34057072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence.
    Page MJ; Moher D; Fidler FM; Higgins JPT; Brennan SE; Haddaway NR; Hamilton DG; Kanukula R; Karunananthan S; Maxwell LJ; McDonald S; Nakagawa S; Nunan D; Tugwell P; Welch VA; McKenzie JE
    Syst Rev; 2021 Apr; 10(1):112. PubMed ID: 33863381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological standards for conducting and reporting meta-analyses: Ensuring the replicability of meta-analyses of pharmacist-led medication review.
    Bonetti AF; Tonin FS; Lucchetta RC; Pontarolo R; Fernandez-Llimos F
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2022 Feb; 18(2):2259-2268. PubMed ID: 34144899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann T; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():60-68. PubMed ID: 31740319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews tool.
    de Kock S; Stirk L; Ross J; Duffy S; Noake C; Misso K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Dec; 37():e18. PubMed ID: 33280626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation strategies, facilitators, and barriers to scaling up and sustaining task-sharing in family planning: a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.
    Aderoba AK; Kabra R; Kiarie JN
    Syst Rev; 2023 Oct; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 37805571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis.
    Cowie K; Rahmatullah A; Hardy N; Holub K; Kallmes K
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 May; 10(5):e33219. PubMed ID: 35499859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review.
    Wang X; Welch V; Li M; Yao L; Littell J; Li H; Yang N; Wang J; Shamseer L; Chen Y; Yang K; Grimshaw JM
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 17(1):e1134. PubMed ID: 37133262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews.
    Farid-Kapadia M; Joachim KC; Balasingham C; Clyburne-Sherin A; Offringa M
    Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):31. PubMed ID: 28260528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.
    Hennessy EA; Tanner-Smith EE; Finch AJ; Sathe N; Kugley S
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-86. PubMed ID: 37131375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.