160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37880807)
1. Causal relationships between breast cancer risk factors based on mammographic features.
Ye Z; Nguyen TL; Dite GS; MacInnis RJ; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Al-Qershi OM; Bui M; Esser VFC; Dowty JG; Trinh HN; Evans CF; Tan M; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Giles GG; Southey MC; Hopper JL; Li S
Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Oct; 25(1):127. PubMed ID: 37880807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding: application to longitudinal twin data on mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.
Stone J; Dite GS; Giles GG; Cawson J; English DR; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1149-55. PubMed ID: 22539605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Dite GS; Stone J; Apicella C; Bui M; Macinnis RJ; Odefrey F; Cawson JN; Treloar SA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2395-403. PubMed ID: 24130221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study.
Dite GS; Gurrin LC; Byrnes GB; Stone J; Gunasekara A; McCredie MR; English DR; Giles GG; Cawson J; Hegele RA; Chiarelli AM; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Dec; 17(12):3474-81. PubMed ID: 19064564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies.
Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29047382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.
Boyd NF; Dite GS; Stone J; Gunasekara A; English DR; McCredie MR; Giles GG; Tritchler D; Chiarelli A; Yaffe MJ; Hopper JL
N Engl J Med; 2002 Sep; 347(12):886-94. PubMed ID: 12239257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs.
Boyd NF; Huszti E; Melnichouk O; Martin LJ; Hislop G; Chiarelli A; Yaffe MJ; Minkin S
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):417. PubMed ID: 25346388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density.
Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell E; Lockwood GA; Little LE; Tritchler DL
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():S47-55. PubMed ID: 10866036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early life socioeconomic environment and mammographic breast density.
Tehranifar P; Cohn BA; Flom JD; Protacio A; Cirillo P; Lumey LH; Michels KB; Terry MB
BMC Cancer; 2017 Jan; 17(1):41. PubMed ID: 28068940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
