These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37881226)

  • 1. Individual consistency in the localised foraging behaviour of shy albatross (
    Mason C; Hobday AJ; Lea MA; Alderman R
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e10644. PubMed ID: 37881226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Climate Change and Fisheries Bycatch on Shy Albatross (Thalassarche cauta) in Southern Australia.
    Thomson RB; Alderman RL; Tuck GN; Hobday AJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127006. PubMed ID: 26057739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shadowed by scale: subtle behavioral niche partitioning in two sympatric, tropical breeding albatross species.
    Conners MG; Hazen EL; Costa DP; Shaffer SA
    Mov Ecol; 2015; 3(1):28. PubMed ID: 26392862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic structure, conservation genetics and evidence of speciation by range expansion in shy and white-capped albatrosses.
    Abbott CL; Double MC
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Nov; 12(11):2953-62. PubMed ID: 14629376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foraging in a dynamic environment: Response of four sympatric sub-Antarctic albatross species to interannual environmental variability.
    Carpenter-Kling T; Reisinger RR; Orgeret F; Connan M; Stevens KL; Ryan PG; Makhado A; Pistorius PA
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):11277-11295. PubMed ID: 33144964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproductive constraints influence habitat accessibility, segregation, and preference of sympatric albatross species.
    Kappes MA; Shaffer SA; Tremblay Y; Foley DG; Palacios DM; Bograd SJ; Costa DP
    Mov Ecol; 2015; 3():34. PubMed ID: 26421151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproductive success is driven by local site fidelity despite stronger specialisation by individuals for large-scale habitat preference.
    Patrick SC; Weimerskirch H
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 May; 86(3):674-682. PubMed ID: 28117897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual Dimorphism and Foraging Trips of the Laysan Albatross (
    Hernández Montoya JC; Juárez-Rodríguez M; Méndez-Sánchez F; Aguirre-Muñoz A; Rojas-Mayoral E; Íñigo-Elias E; Galina-Tessaro P; Arnaud G; Ortega-Rubio A
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 31212935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Land or sea? Foraging area choice during breeding by an omnivorous gull.
    Isaksson N; Evans TJ; Shamoun-Baranes J; Åkesson S
    Mov Ecol; 2016; 4():11. PubMed ID: 27186375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of age on foraging behavior in two closely related albatross species.
    Frankish CK; Manica A; Phillips RA
    Mov Ecol; 2020; 8():7. PubMed ID: 32047635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality predicts foraging site fidelity and trip repeatability in a marine predator.
    Harris SM; Descamps S; Sneddon LU; Bertrand P; Chastel O; Patrick SC
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 31541578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-individual differences in foraging tactics of a colonial raptor: consistency, weather effects, and fitness correlates.
    Cecere JG; De Pascalis F; Imperio S; Ménard D; Catoni C; Griggio M; Rubolini D
    Mov Ecol; 2020; 8():28. PubMed ID: 32587702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seabirds show foraging site and route fidelity but demonstrate flexibility in response to local information.
    Regan CE; Bogdanova MI; Newell M; Gunn C; Wanless S; Harris MP; Lopez SL; Benninghaus E; Bolton M; Daunt F; Searle KR
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jun; 12(1):46. PubMed ID: 38872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Traversing the land-sea interface: A climate change risk assessment of terrestrially breeding marine predators.
    Sojitra M; Corney S; Hemer M; Hamilton S; McInnes J; Thalmann S; Lea MA
    Glob Chang Biol; 2024 Aug; 30(8):e17452. PubMed ID: 39162042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulation of foraging trips and incubation routine in male and female wandering albatrosses.
    Weimerskirch H
    Oecologia; 1995 Apr; 102(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28306805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foraging behavior links climate variability and reproduction in North Pacific albatrosses.
    Thorne LH; Hazen EL; Bograd SJ; Foley DG; Conners MG; Kappes MA; Kim HM; Costa DP; Tremblay Y; Shaffer SA
    Mov Ecol; 2015; 3():27. PubMed ID: 26430513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geographical, temporal and individual factors influencing foraging behaviour and consistency in Australasian gannets.
    Rodríguez-Malagón MA; Camprasse ECM; Angel LP; Arnould JPY
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 May; 7(5):181423. PubMed ID: 32537184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consistent Site-Specific Foraging Behaviours of Yellow-eyed Penguins/Hoiho Breeding on Stewart Island, New Zealand.
    Elley T; Mattern T; Ellenberg U; Young MJ; Hickcox RP; van Heezik Y; Seddon PJ
    Biology (Basel); 2022 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 35741366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Divergent foraging strategies during incubation of an unusually wide-ranging seabird, the Murphy's petrel.
    Clay TA; Oppel S; Lavers JL; Phillips RA; Brooke ML
    Mar Biol; 2019; 166(1):8. PubMed ID: 30595609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foraging niche overlap during chick-rearing in the sexually dimorphic Westland petrel.
    Poupart TA; Waugh SM; Kato A; Arnould JPY
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Nov; 7(11):191511. PubMed ID: 33391777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.