These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37882091)

  • 1. Pupil Dilation Reflects Perceptual Priorities During a Receptive Speech Task.
    Mechtenberg H; Giorio C; Myers EB
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):425-440. PubMed ID: 37882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slower Speaking Rate Reduces Listening Effort Among Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Teece KH
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):584-595. PubMed ID: 33002968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation.
    Kadem M; Herrmann B; Rodd JM; Johnsrude IS
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520964068. PubMed ID: 33124518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Mar; 51(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 24506437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study.
    Borghini G; Hazan V
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():152. PubMed ID: 29593489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pupillometry reveals differences in cognitive demands of listening to face mask-attenuated speech.
    Carraturo S; McLaughlin DJ; Peelle JE; Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Dec; 154(6):3973-3985. PubMed ID: 38149818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effort of Repairing a Misperceived Word Can Impair Perception of Following Words, Especially for Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1527-1541. PubMed ID: 38886880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.
    Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry.
    Lewis GA; Bidelman GM
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1418. PubMed ID: 31998068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
    Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.