These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3788264)
1. Peer review in Virginia. Morton RA Va Med; 1986 Oct; 113(10):584-6. PubMed ID: 3788264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician peer review in New Jersey. Dwyer WA N J Med; 1989 Feb; 86(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2710420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The professional practice climate and peer review. Hawthorne J; Roe C; Woods D Nursingconnections; 1989; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 2716863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review in the university hospital setting. Wirtschafter DD Ala J Med Sci; 1986 Jan; 23(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 3456729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Only you can make the difference. Peer review needs you. Seitzinger DB Ohio Med; 1991 Jun; 87(6):295, 298, 303. PubMed ID: 1861835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The fate of review. Webber A Ala J Med Sci; 1986 Jan; 23(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 3953977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assurance under the Missouri PRO program. Akhter MN Mo Med; 1985 Jun; 82(6):297-9. PubMed ID: 4040209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in complaints against the medical profession: an analysis of the work of the SMS commission on Mediation and Peer Review. Long JP Wis Med J; 1993 May; 92(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 8328161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review in Minnesota--the Foundation for Health Care Evaluation-1985. Woellner RC Minn Med; 1985 Jun; 68(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 4040600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The PRO: open season on physicians? Foley CM Minn Med; 1988 Nov; 71(11):671-2. PubMed ID: 3193937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Further development of peer-review-procedures in medical rehabilitation]. Farin E; Carl C; Jäckel WH; Rütten-Köppel E; Maier-Riehle B; Berghaus U Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Jun; 43(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 15202040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality assurance in medicine]. Paschen U; Jaacks H Med Klin (Munich); 1990 Aug; 85(8):504-6. PubMed ID: 2233605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A New World order: is big brother watching your medical practice? Musgrave TL; Greene T; Stephens JB; Sensabaugh J; Johnson K; Fitts J J Tenn Med Assoc; 1993 Dec; 86(12):529-31. PubMed ID: 8295424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. External factors will affect quality assurance in the '80s. Blanton WB Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Jan; 7(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 10289325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluating the rehabilitation process by means of peer review: examination of the methods used and findings of the 2000/2001 data collection in the somatic indications]. Farin E; Carl C; Lichtenberg S; Jäckel WH; Maier-Riehle B; Rütten-Köppel E Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Dec; 42(6):323-34. PubMed ID: 14677103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of the Peer Review Organization program. Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 Nov; 10(11):340-6. PubMed ID: 6441136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New developments at the Connecticut Peer Review Organization. Meehan TP Conn Med; 1993 Aug; 57(8):533-5. PubMed ID: 8243082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]