These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37883046)

  • 1. Beyond quantity of experience: Exploring the role of semantic consistency in Chinese character knowledge.
    Hsieh CY; Marelli M; Rastle K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 May; 50(5):819-832. PubMed ID: 37883046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ERP megastudy of Chinese word recognition.
    Tsang YK; Zou Y
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14111. PubMed ID: 35609148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The modulation of semantic transparency on the recognition memory for two-character Chinese words.
    Han YJ; Huang SC; Lee CY; Kuo WJ; Cheng SK
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1315-24. PubMed ID: 24894986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading.
    Li X; Rayner K; Cave KR
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Jun; 58(4):525-52. PubMed ID: 19345938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it's composed of noncontiguous characters.
    Ma G; Pollatsek A; Li Y; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):158-166. PubMed ID: 27504682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words.
    Tse CS; Chan YL; Yap MJ; Tsang HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4382-4402. PubMed ID: 36443581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.
    Sze WP; Yap MJ; Rickard Liow SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1541-70. PubMed ID: 25622522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanism of semantic processing of lexicalized and novel compound words: An eye movement study.
    Wang J; Yang J; Biemann C; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1812-1822. PubMed ID: 38095934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compositionality of the Constituent Characters in Chinese Two-Character-Word Recognition by Adult Readers of High and Low Chinese Proficiency.
    Lv J; Zhuang B; Chen X; Xue L; Li D
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Feb; 51(1):195-216. PubMed ID: 34997424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.
    Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repetition causes confusion: Insights to word segmentation during Chinese reading.
    Wang J; Angele B; Ma G; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):147-156. PubMed ID: 31944807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision.
    Chang YN; Lee CY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 32789580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese.
    Tsang YK; Huang J; Lui M; Xue M; Chan YF; Wang S; Chen HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1763-1777. PubMed ID: 28779457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.
    Kang SH; Yap MJ; Tse CS; Kurby CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21644189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rethinking orthographic neighbor in Chinese two-character word recognition: Insights from a megastudy.
    Tsang YK; Zou Y; Wang J; Wong AW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38169040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competition between parts and whole: A new approach to Chinese compound word processing.
    Zhang Q; Huang KJ; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 May; 50(5):479-497. PubMed ID: 38546626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-character Orthographic Similarity Effects on the Recognition of Chinese Coordinative Compound Words.
    Sun J; Zhao W; Pae HK
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Feb; 49(1):125-145. PubMed ID: 31583601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.