These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37883049)

  • 1. The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):967-984. PubMed ID: 37883049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.
    Parker AJ; Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1614-1633. PubMed ID: 31524433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements and word skipping during reading: effects of word length and predictability.
    Rayner K; Slattery TJ; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):514-28. PubMed ID: 21463086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural dynamics of sentiment processing during naturalistic sentence reading.
    Pfeiffer C; Hollenstein N; Zhang C; Langer N
    Neuroimage; 2020 Sep; 218():116934. PubMed ID: 32416227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
    Dirix N; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading proficiency predicts spatial eye-movement control in the first and second language.
    Gnetov D; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Aug; 50(8):1315-1328. PubMed ID: 38330333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Child readers' eye movements in reading Thai.
    Kasisopa B; Reilly RG; Luksaneeyanawin S; Burnham D
    Vision Res; 2016 Jun; 123():8-19. PubMed ID: 27137836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting Huey: on the importance of the upper part of words during reading.
    Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1148-53. PubMed ID: 22895885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word length effects on novel words: evidence from eye movements.
    Lowell R; Morris RK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 24092359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
    Albrengues C; Lavigne F; Aguilar C; Castet E; Vitu F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219666. PubMed ID: 31329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of reading skill and word length on fixation-related brain activity in school-aged children during natural reading.
    Loberg O; Hautala J; Hämäläinen JA; Leppänen PHT
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():109-122. PubMed ID: 31710840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word processing during reading sentences in patients with schizophrenia: evidences from the eyetracking technique.
    Fernández G; Sapognikoff M; Guinjoan S; Orozco D; Agamennoni O
    Compr Psychiatry; 2016 Jul; 68():193-200. PubMed ID: 27234202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading.
    Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Xu Q; Zhang K; Wang J; Paterson KB
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):780-790. PubMed ID: 31380666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.