These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3788342)
41. Pinworm granuloma of cervix uteri--incidental observation following IUD use and cone biopsy. Campbell JS; Mandavia S; Threlfall W; McCarthy P; Loveys CN J Trop Med Hyg; 1981 Oct; 84(5):215-7. PubMed ID: 7299880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Gynefix tales: cervical perforation and repeated late expulsion with the Gynefix device. Oswal A; Oswal A; Loizides S; Robinson C Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jun; 13(2):215-7. PubMed ID: 18465487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Avoidance of the dimensional incompatibility as the main reason for side effects in intrauterine contraception. Kurz KH Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jan; 2(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12278585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cytologic and histologic findings in women using an IUD. Risse EK; Beerthuizen RJ; Vooijs GP Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov; 58(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 7301231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Letter: Is the copper-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device able to induce unphysiologic cell differentiation in the uterine cervix? Rubinstein E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 125(2):277. PubMed ID: 1266915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Insertion of intra-uterine devices. Some technical considerations: II. Goldstuck ND Practitioner; 1982 Jul; 226(1369):1319-23. PubMed ID: 7111168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Mechanisms of action of IUDs, with special reference to Cu-T devices]. Osa Gonzalez EL; Escudero Fernandez M Acta Ginecol (Madr); 1975 Mar; 26():267-72. PubMed ID: 12258778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Deposit on the surface of IUDs. A preliminary report. Tötterman LE; Arstila AA Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1971; 60(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 5156618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [Cytological changes observed with the use of intrauterine devices]. De Larios NM; Rubio Lotvin B; Ruiz Moreno JA Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1974 Mar; 35(209):301-6. PubMed ID: 4832730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [The endometrial bacterial flora following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device]. Wajntraub G; Godfried L; Czaczkes E; Aloni T Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Apr; 68(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 17474191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Uterine perforations with Copper T IUDs. Prema K; Malhotra U; Choudhury SD; Saxena NC Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Oct; 2(4):327-29. PubMed ID: 12336994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Extraction of pieces of an intrauterine contraceptive device]. Vasilev D Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1982; 21(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 7137508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action. Ortiz ME; Croxatto HB Contraception; 2007 Jun; 75(6 Suppl):S16-30. PubMed ID: 17531610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Long term effects of copper intrauterine devices on cervical epithelium and endometrium. Aikat M; Chadda U Indian J Med Res; 1980 Jun; 71():879-83. PubMed ID: 7419250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Analysis of surface deposits on intrauterine contraceptive devices. Yuan W; Shen H; Lu J; Fan J Adv Contracept; 1986 Jun; 2(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 3776746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Intracervical anchoring: a new approach to intrauterine contraception. van Os WA; de Nooyer CC; Kivijarvi A; Nahmonovici C Adv Contracept; 1993 Mar; 9(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 8342456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diagnostic ultrasound in the management of patients using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Wittmann BK; Chow TT Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Oct; 83(10):802-8. PubMed ID: 990221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]