139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37884007)
1. Complete Compared With Partial Salpingectomy for Postpartum Sterilization.
McCarley CB; Boitano TK; Dilley SE; Subramaniam A
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 142(6):1347-1356. PubMed ID: 37884007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.
Naumann RW; Hughes BN; Brown J; Drury LK; Herzog TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):397.e1-397.e6. PubMed ID: 33798477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technique for bilateral salpingectomy at the time of Cesarean delivery: a case series.
Duncan JR; Schenone MH; Mari G
Contraception; 2017 May; 95(5):509-511. PubMed ID: 28263747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy vs Tubal Occlusion or Ligation for Ovarian Cancer Prophylaxis.
Ely LK; Truong M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 28087480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postpartum Opportunistic Salpingectomy Compared With Bilateral Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Wagar MK; Forlines GL; Moellman N; Carlson A; Matthews M; Williams M
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 141(4):819-827. PubMed ID: 36897130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Salpingectomy and Ovarian Cancer Prevention.
Harris AL
Nurs Womens Health; 2015 Dec-2016 Jan; 19(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 26682662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller D; McAlpine JN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):172.e1-172.e8. PubMed ID: 29852159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.
Hanley GE; McAlpine JN; Pearce CL; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):270.e1-270.e9. PubMed ID: 27810554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Subramaniam A; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29889762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits and Risks of Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Delivery for Permanent Postpartum Contraception.
Luke S; Addae-Konadu K; Davidson B; Kuller J; Dotters-Katz S
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2022 Mar; 77(3):167-173. PubMed ID: 35275215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.
Powell CB; Alabaster A; Simmons S; Garcia C; Martin M; McBride-Allen S; Littell RD
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):961-967. PubMed ID: 29016486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Trend, Feasibility, and Safety of Salpingectomy as a form of Permanent Sterilization.
Kim AJ; Barberio A; Berens P; Chen HY; Gants S; Swilinski L; Acholonu U; Chang-Jackson SC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1363-1368. PubMed ID: 30771489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review of Sterilization Techniques and Clinical Updates.
Clark NV; Endicott SP; Jorgensen EM; Hur HC; Lockrow EG; Kern ME; Jones-Cox CE; Dunlow SG; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1157-1164. PubMed ID: 28939482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.
Shinar S; Blecher Y; Alpern S; Many A; Ashwal E; Amikam U; Cohen A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 28285425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal.
Creinin MD; Zite N
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 124(3):596-599. PubMed ID: 25162262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
