These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37884918)

  • 21. A fully deep learning model for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Kim YH; Lee C; Ha EG; Choi YJ; Han SS
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Sep; 51(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 34621657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated detection of cephalometric landmarks using deep neural patchworks.
    Weingart JV; Schlager S; Metzger MC; Brandenburg LS; Hein A; Schmelzeisen R; Bamberg F; Kim S; Kellner E; Reisert M; Russe MF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Sep; 52(6):20230059. PubMed ID: 37427585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and clinical validity of automated cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural networks.
    Kang S; Kim I; Kim YJ; Kim N; Baek SH; Sung SJ
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Feb; 27(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 37326233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Greiner M; Greiner A; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 17639277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A semi-supervised learning approach for automated 3D cephalometric landmark identification using computed tomography.
    Yun HS; Hyun CM; Baek SH; Lee SH; Seo JK
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275114. PubMed ID: 36170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. 3D Facial Landmark Localization for cephalometric analysis.
    Torres HR; Morais P; Fritze A; Oliveira B; Veloso F; Rudiger M; Fonseca JC; Vilaca JL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1016-1019. PubMed ID: 36083940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.
    Mosleh MA; Baba MS; Malek S; Almaktari RA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):499. PubMed ID: 28155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images.
    Kim MJ; Liu Y; Oh SH; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33445758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks.
    Lee JH; Yu HJ; Kim MJ; Kim JW; Choi J
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):270. PubMed ID: 33028287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic recognition of cephalometric landmarks via multi-scale sampling strategy.
    Zhao C; Yuan Z; Luo S; Wang W; Ren Z; Yao X; Wu T
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e17459. PubMed ID: 37416642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic craniomaxillofacial landmarks detection in CT images of individuals with dentomaxillofacial deformities by a two-stage deep learning model.
    Tao L; Li M; Zhang X; Cheng M; Yang Y; Fu Y; Zhang R; Qian D; Yu H
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):876. PubMed ID: 37978486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An automatic cephalometric landmark detection method based on heatmap regression and Monte Carlo dropout.
    Chen J; Che H; Sun J; Rao Y; Wu J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schwendicke F; Chaurasia A; Arsiwala L; Lee JH; Elhennawy K; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Demarco F; Krois J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4299-4309. PubMed ID: 34046742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net.
    Kim IH; Kim YG; Kim S; Park JW; Kim N
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7925. PubMed ID: 33846506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of conventional versus cone-beam CT-synthesised lateral cephalograms for cephalometric analysis: A systematic review.
    Raj G; Raj M; Saigo L
    J Orthod; 2024 Jun; 51(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 37340975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.