These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3788574)
1. An investigation of three commercial methods for rapid identification of non-enteric gram-negative rods. Application on Pseudomonas paucimobilis and some other Pseudomonas species. Søgaard P; Gahrn-Hansen B; Zhou HP; Frederiksen W Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Oct; 94(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 3788574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test]. Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, and Alcaligenes with the API 20 NE system. Peladan F; Monteil H Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Feb; 36(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 3279389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Moll WM; Ungerechts J; Marklein G; Schaal KP Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1996 Jul; 284(2-3):329-47. PubMed ID: 8837394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the API 20E and Corning N/F systems for identification of nonfermentative gram-negative rods. Warwood NM; Blazevic DJ; Hofherr L J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 389947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation of a collection of yellow-pigmented Pseudomonas. Søgaard P; Hansen BG; Frederiksen W Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Jun; 94(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 3739714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An unusual yellow pigmented Pseudomonas species isolated from chlorinated municipal town water supply. O'Brien JR Microbios; 1992; 69(280-281):215-21. PubMed ID: 1593969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of a commercial system for identification of gram-positive cocci. von Baum H; Klemme FR; Geiss HK; Sonntag HG Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Dec; 17(12):849-52. PubMed ID: 10052548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Phenotype characteristics of 63 strains of Pseudomonas paucimobilis, mostly of hospital origin]. Richard C Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1986; 44(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 3706830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three methods for identifying nonfermenting gram-negative rods. Hofherr L; Votava H; Blazevic DJ Can J Microbiol; 1978 Oct; 24(10):1140-4. PubMed ID: 365307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Multicenter study of the Rosco-Neisseria system for the identification of pathogenic neisserias and Branhamella catarrhalis]. Pérez JL; Sauca G; Pulido A; Murgui L; García D; Bosch J Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1991 Feb; 9(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 1677275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of commercial test systems for the identification of nonfermenters. Lampe AS; van der Reijden TJ Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 6386458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative evaluation of commercial test systems for the identification of gram-negative bacteria]. Zubkov MN; Sutormina TM Antibiot Khimioter; 1988 May; 33(5):346-51. PubMed ID: 3415390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of API 20 NE in routine diagnostics of nonfermenting gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Geiss HK; Piotrowski HD; Hingst V Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1985 Feb; 259(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 3890425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The similarities between Pseudomonas paucimobilis and allied bacteria derived from analysis of deoxyribonucleic acids and electrophoretic protein patterns. Owen RJ; Jackman PJ J Gen Microbiol; 1982 Dec; 128(12):2945-54. PubMed ID: 7183747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a conventional routine method for identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species. Comparison with API-Staph and API-Staph-Ident. Gahrn-Hansen B; Heltberg O; Rosdahl VT; Søgaard P Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1987 Oct; 95(5):283-92. PubMed ID: 3314337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of two test-kits--API and Oxi Ferm tube--for identification of oxidative-fermentative Gram-negative rods. Nord CE; Wretlind B; Dahlbäck A Med Microbiol Immunol; 1977 Jul; 163(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 331064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 16S rRNA gene sequencing versus the API 20 NE system and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card for identification of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory. Bosshard PP; Zbinden R; Abels S; Böddinghaus B; Altwegg M; Böttger EC J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 44(4):1359-66. PubMed ID: 16597863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Enteric-Tek with API 20E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Bruckner DA; Clark V; Martin WJ J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jan; 15(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 7186904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cultivation and rapid enzyme identification of DF-2. Heltberg O; Busk HE; Bremmelgaard A; Kristiansen JE; Frederiksen W Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 3(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 6381050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]