These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37887100)

  • 21. Multiplexing microelectrodes for dielectrophoretic manipulation and electrical impedance measurement of single particles and cells in a microfluidic device.
    Geng Y; Zhu Z; Wang Y; Wang Y; Ouyang S; Zheng K; Ye W; Fan Y; Wang Z; Pan D
    Electrophoresis; 2019 May; 40(10):1436-1445. PubMed ID: 30706494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Positional dependence of particles and cells in microfluidic electrical impedance flow cytometry: origin, challenges and opportunities.
    Daguerre H; Solsona M; Cottet J; Gauthier M; Renaud P; Bolopion A
    Lab Chip; 2020 Oct; 20(20):3665-3689. PubMed ID: 32914827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Label-free electrical discrimination of cells at normal, apoptotic and necrotic status with a microfluidic device.
    Gou HL; Zhang XB; Bao N; Xu JJ; Xia XH; Chen HY
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Aug; 1218(33):5725-9. PubMed ID: 21774939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Design and 3D modeling investigation of a microfluidic electrode array for electrical impedance measurement of single yeast cells.
    Geng Y; Zhu Z; Zhang Z; Xu F; Marchisio MA; Wang Z; Pan D; Zhao X; Huang QA
    Electrophoresis; 2021 Oct; 42(20):1996-2009. PubMed ID: 33938013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Classification of cell types using a microfluidic device for mechanical and electrical measurement on single cells.
    Chen J; Zheng Y; Tan Q; Shojaei-Baghini E; Zhang YL; Li J; Prasad P; You L; Wu XY; Sun Y
    Lab Chip; 2011 Sep; 11(18):3174-81. PubMed ID: 21826361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impedance-Based Multimodal Electrical-Mechanical Intrinsic Flow Cytometry.
    Feng Y; Zhu J; Chai H; He W; Huang L; Wang W
    Small; 2023 Nov; 19(45):e2303416. PubMed ID: 37438542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impedance detection integrated with dielectrophoresis enrichment platform for lung circulating tumor cells in a microfluidic channel.
    Nguyen NV; Jen CP
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2018 Dec; 121():10-18. PubMed ID: 30189335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electrical impedance as an indicator of microalgal cell health.
    Sui J; Foflonker F; Bhattacharya D; Javanmard M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):1251. PubMed ID: 31988339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic monitoring of single cell lysis in an impedance-based microfluidic device.
    Zhou Y; Basu S; Laue ED; Seshia AA
    Biomed Microdevices; 2016 Aug; 18(4):56. PubMed ID: 27299468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantification of Cell Death Using an Impedance-Based Microfluidic Device.
    Mansoorifar A; Koklu A; Beskok A
    Anal Chem; 2019 Mar; 91(6):4140-4148. PubMed ID: 30793881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microfluidic characterization of specific membrane capacitance and cytoplasm conductivity of single cells.
    Zheng Y; Shojaei-Baghini E; Wang C; Sun Y
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2013 Apr; 42():496-502. PubMed ID: 23246657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modified Red Blood Cells as Multimodal Standards for Benchmarking Single-Cell Cytometry and Separation Based on Electrical Physiology.
    Salahi A; Honrado C; Rane A; Caselli F; Swami NS
    Anal Chem; 2022 Feb; 94(6):2865-2872. PubMed ID: 35107262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhancing signals of microfluidic impedance cytometry through optimization of microelectrode array.
    Zhou C; Shen H; Feng H; Yan Z; Ji B; Yuan X; Zhang R; Chang H
    Electrophoresis; 2022 Nov; 43(21-22):2156-2164. PubMed ID: 35305273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the Accuracy of Impedance Flow Cytometry with Cell-Sized Liposomes.
    Chai H; Feng Y; Zhu J; Meng X; Liang F; Bai J; Wang W
    ACS Sens; 2023 Jul; 8(7):2681-2690. PubMed ID: 37347966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Response characteristics of single-cell impedance sensors employed with surface-modified microelectrodes.
    Thein M; Asphahani F; Cheng A; Buckmaster R; Zhang M; Xu J
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Apr; 25(8):1963-9. PubMed ID: 20176469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Label-free identification of activated T lymphocytes through tridimensional microsensors on chip.
    Rollo E; Tenaglia E; Genolet R; Bianchi E; Harari A; Coukos G; Guiducci C
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2017 Aug; 94():193-199. PubMed ID: 28284079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microfluidic deformability cytometry: A review.
    Chen Y; Guo K; Jiang L; Zhu S; Ni Z; Xiang N
    Talanta; 2023 Jan; 251():123815. PubMed ID: 35952505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural network-enhanced real-time impedance flow cytometry for single-cell intrinsic characterization.
    Feng Y; Cheng Z; Chai H; He W; Huang L; Wang W
    Lab Chip; 2022 Jan; 22(2):240-249. PubMed ID: 34849522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Instrumentation of a Microfluidic Analyzer Enabling the Characterization of the Specific Membrane Capacitance, Cytoplasm Conductivity, and Instantaneous Young's Modulus of Single Cells.
    Wang K; Zhao Y; Chen D; Huang C; Fan B; Long R; Hsieh CH; Wang J; Wu MH; Chen J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Jun; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 28629175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Size and dielectric properties of skeletal stem cells change critically after enrichment and expansion from human bone marrow: consequences for microfluidic cell sorting.
    Xavier M; de Andrés MC; Spencer D; Oreffo ROC; Morgan H
    J R Soc Interface; 2017 Aug; 14(133):. PubMed ID: 28835540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.