These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3788730)

  • 61. Children's aesthetic understanding of photographic art and the quality of art-related parent-child interactions.
    Szechter LE; Liben LS
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(3):879-94. PubMed ID: 17517010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Establishing Photographic Standards for Facial Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Wolfe EM; Najera-Sweeney G; Berman ZP; Alfonso AR; Diep GK; Ramly EP; Rodriguez ED
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 May; 8(5):e2834. PubMed ID: 33154875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Principles of photography in rhinoplasty for the digital photographer.
    Swamy RS; Sykes JM; Most SP
    Clin Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 20206739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Photography and plastic surgery. From scientific honesty in general...to photographic touching up in particular].
    Petit F
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1997 Dec; 42(6):644. PubMed ID: 9768110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Standardized facial photography of cleft patients: just fit the grid?
    Vegter F; Hage JJ
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Sep; 37(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 11034024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Camera and lens selection for the facial plastic surgeon.
    Peck JJ; Roofe SB; Kawasaki DK
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2010 May; 18(2):223-30, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20511071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The management of serial photographs in a small research project.
    Mireylees B
    J Audiov Media Med; 1993 Jul; 16(3):106-8. PubMed ID: 8409225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Development of a methodology for the standardisation and improvement of 'Smartphone' photography of patterned bruises and other cutaneous injuries.
    Biggs PR; Evans ST; Jones MD; Theobald PS
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 23937947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Facial Impairment Scales for Clefts.
    Tobiasen JM; Hiebert JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jan; 93(1):31-41; discussion 42-3. PubMed ID: 8278483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Standardization of photography of the orofacial region].
    Handzić J; Bagatin M
    Chir Maxillofac Plast; 1987; 17(2-3):71-5. PubMed ID: 3483332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Photography and plastic surgery: part 1.
    Spear M; Hagan K
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2008; 28(2):66-8; quiz 69-70. PubMed ID: 18562895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Aesthetic surgery: how it affects the way patients are perceived by others.
    Kalick SM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1979 Feb; 2(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 426454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Aesthetic surgery: realities of virtuality. On the influence of images, new information and communication technologies, and the internet].
    Petit F; Smarrito S; Kron C
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2003 Oct; 48(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 14599912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Exploring the art of medical photography - an otolaryngologist's perspective.
    Samaddar S; Maiti A; Samaddar S; Mondal B; Bandyopadhyay S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2022 Dec; 136(12):1148-1163. PubMed ID: 34593064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.
    Wall S; Kazahaya K; Becker SS; Becker DG
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 11816120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Calibrating UVA reflectance photographs - standardisation using a low-cost method.
    Crowther JM
    J Vis Commun Med; 2018 Jul; 41(3):109-117. PubMed ID: 30033831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Clinical photography utilizing office staff: methods to achieve consistency and reproducibility.
    Gilmore J; Miller W
    J Dermatol Surg Oncol; 1988 Mar; 14(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 3346462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Pitfalls of photography for facial resurfacing and rejuvenation procedures.
    Shah AR; Dayan SH; Hamilton GS
    Facial Plast Surg; 2005 May; 21(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 16049895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Digital photography as a means of enhancing interconsultant communication in oncological cutaneous surgery.
    Karim RB; Hage JJ; Ahmed AK; de Wit FS; van de Sandt MM; Daemen A
    Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Feb; 48(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 11910224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. What Do Our Patients Truly Want? Conjoint Analysis of an Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice Using Internet Crowdsourcing.
    Wu C; Scott Hultman C; Diegidio P; Hermiz S; Garimella R; Crutchfield TM; Lee CN
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Jan; 37(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 27651401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.