These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37888143)

  • 1. Some Evidence That Truth-Tellers Are More Attractive Than Liars.
    Ten Brinke L; Raymundo I; Mukherjee M; Carney DR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; ():1461672231207567. PubMed ID: 37888143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Registered report: measuring unconscious deception detection by skin temperature.
    van ' T Veer AE; Stel M; van Beest I; Gallucci M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():442. PubMed ID: 24904461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgments-results of a registered report.
    van 't Veer AE; Gallucci M; Stel M; van Beest I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():672. PubMed ID: 26106339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; de la Riva C; Herrero C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():45-55. PubMed ID: 27219533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Been there before? Examining "familiarity" as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions.
    Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():677. PubMed ID: 25071648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How deception and believability feedback affect recall.
    Vo TVA; Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):706-714. PubMed ID: 33557706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
    Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.
    Vrij A; Hartwig M; Granhag PA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():295-317. PubMed ID: 30609913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related differences in deception.
    Ruffman T; Murray J; Halberstadt J; Vater T
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Sep; 27(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 21463058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.