These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37891055)

  • 1. Comparison among various physiology and angiography-guided strategies for deferring percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.
    Kiyohara Y; Kishino Y; Ueyama HA; Takahashi T; Kobayashi Y; Takagi H; Wiley J; Kuno T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Apr; 61():35-41. PubMed ID: 37891055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention.
    Kuno T; Kiyohara Y; Maehara A; Ueyama HA; Kampaktsis PN; Takagi H; Mehran R; Stone GW; Bhatt DL; Mintz GS; Bangalore S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 82(23):2167-2176. PubMed ID: 37995152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QFR Assessment and Prognosis After Nonculprit PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Lee SH; Hong D; Shin D; Kim HK; Park KH; Choo EH; Kim CJ; Kim MC; Hong YJ; Ahn SG; Doh JH; Lee SY; Park SD; Lee HJ; Kang MG; Koh JS; Cho YK; Nam CW; Joh HS; Choi KH; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Jeong MH; Gwon HC; Hahn JY; Lee JM;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Oct; 16(19):2365-2379. PubMed ID: 37821181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Siddiqi TJ; Khan MS; Karimi Galougahi K; Shlofmitz E; Moses JW; Rao S; West NEJ; Wolff E; Hochler J; Chau K; Khalique O; Shlofmitz RA; Jeremias A; Ali ZA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 100 Suppl 1():S44-S56. PubMed ID: 36251325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of immediate complete vs staged complete revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease.
    Singh S; Garg A; Chaudhary R; Rout A; Tantry US; Bliden K; Gurbel PA
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Mar; 60():1-8. PubMed ID: 37813709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Functionally Complete vs Incomplete Revascularization: Insights From the FAVOR III China Trial.
    Zhang R; Wang HY; Dou K; Yin D; Zhu C; Feng L; Zhou Y; Pu J; Zhang Q; Pan H; Mi J; Ye F; Cheng X; Guo N; Guan C; Song L; Qiao S; Tu S; Xu B; Stone GW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; 15(24):2490-2502. PubMed ID: 36543443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Coronary Stenoses for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    d'Entremont MA; Tiong D; Sadeghirad B; McGrath BP; Cioffi GM; Garni TA; Cheema ZM; Layland J; Revaiah PC; Serruys PW; Stone GW; Jolly SS
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 223():29-39. PubMed ID: 38768846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between functional and intravascular imaging approaches guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized and propensity matching studies.
    Iannaccone M; Abdirashid M; Annone U; Saint-Hilary G; Meier P; Chieffo A; Chen S; di Mario C; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; De Benedictis M; Rettegno S; Doronzo B; Gasparini M; Rinaldi M; D'Amico M; D'Ascenzo F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 31400061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) - versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Wang Y; Yang X; Wu Y; Li Y; Zhou Y
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2024 May; 24(1):262. PubMed ID: 38769510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary angiography- or fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization in multivessel disease STEMI: A Bayesian hierarchical network meta-analysis.
    Archilletti F; Ricci F; Pelliccia F; Dangas G; Giuliani L; Radico F; Perfetti M; Rossi S; Gallina S; Maddestra N; Khanji MY; Zimarino M
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 370():122-128. PubMed ID: 36328114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial.
    Biscaglia S; Verardi FM; Tebaldi M; Guiducci V; Caglioni S; Campana R; Scala A; Marrone A; Pompei G; Marchini F; Scancarello D; Pignatelli G; D'Amore SM; Colaiori I; Demola P; Di Serafino L; Tumscitz C; Penzo C; Erriquez A; Manfrini M; Campo G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Apr; 16(7):783-794. PubMed ID: 36898939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Andersen BK; Ding D; Mogensen LJH; Tu S; Holm NR; Westra J; Wijns W
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2023 Feb; 9(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 36026514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial.
    Song L; Tu S; Sun Z; Wang Y; Ding D; Guan C; Xie L; Escaned J; Fearon WF; Kirtane AJ; Serruys PW; Wijns W; Windecker S; Leon MB; Stone GW; Qiao S; Xu B;
    Am Heart J; 2020 May; 223():72-80. PubMed ID: 32179258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angiography versus FFR guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization for patients presenting with STEMI: Network meta-analysis.
    Okuya Y; Gohil K; Moussa ID
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 100(3):340-350. PubMed ID: 35789058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic impact of fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a subanalysis of the FLORIDA study.
    Gerhardt T; Stähli BE; Rudolph TK; Lutz M; Schatz AS; Zanders L; Schubert T; Stueve M; West NEJ; Boone E; Landmesser U; Leistner DM
    Heart Vessels; 2023 Aug; 38(8):1009-1018. PubMed ID: 37067577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary intervention against angiography guided in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Wulandari AP; Pintaningrum Y; Adheriyani R
    Indian Heart J; 2023; 75(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 36758830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions.
    Song L; Xu B; Tu S; Guan C; Jin Z; Yu B; Fu G; Zhou Y; Wang J; Chen Y; Pu J; Chen L; Qu X; Yang J; Liu X; Guo L; Shen C; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Pan H; Zhang R; Liu J; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Dou K; Kirtane AJ; Wu Y; Wijns W; Yang W; Leon MB; Qiao S; Stone GW;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Nov; 80(22):2089-2101. PubMed ID: 36424680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.
    Alsidawi S; Effat M; Rahman S; Abdallah M; Leesar M
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Dec; 33(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 26363283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.