BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37891369)

  • 1. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety (LC-CVS): a multi-national validation study of an objective, procedure-specific assessment using video-based assessment (VBA).
    Adrales G; Ardito F; Chowbey P; Morales-Conde S; Ferreres AR; Hensman C; Martin D; Matthaei H; Ramshaw B; Roberts JK; Schrem H; Sharma A; Tabiri S; Vibert E; Woods MS
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):922-930. PubMed ID: 37891369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-national, video-based qualitative study to refine training guidelines for assigning an "unsafe" score in laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety.
    Adrales G; Ardito F; Chowbey P; Morales-Conde S; Ferreres AR; Hensman C; Martin D; Matthaei H; Ramshaw B; Roberts JK; Schrem H; Sharma A; Tabiri S; Vibert E; Woods MS
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):983-991. PubMed ID: 37973638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and preliminary validation of a new task-based objective procedure-specific assessment of inguinal hernia repair procedural safety.
    Nikolian VC; Camacho D; Earle D; Lehmann R; Nau P; Ramshaw B; Stulberg J
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Mar; 38(3):1583-1591. PubMed ID: 38332173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global assessment of surgical skills (GASS): validation of a new instrument to measure global technical safety in surgical procedures.
    Nau P; Worden E; Lehmann R; Kleppe K; Mancini GJ; Mancini ML; Ramshaw B
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7964-7969. PubMed ID: 37442836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety.
    Mascagni P; Fiorillo C; Urade T; Emre T; Yu T; Wakabayashi T; Felli E; Perretta S; Swanstrom L; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Pessaux P; Costamagna G; Padoy N; Dallemagne B
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2709-2714. PubMed ID: 31583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cut or Do Not Cut? Assessing Perceptions of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Surgical Videos.
    Carr BD; Matusko N; Sandhu G; Varban OA
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1583-1588. PubMed ID: 29929815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Kawamura M; Endo Y; Fujinaga A; Orimoto H; Amano S; Kawasaki T; Kawano Y; Masuda T; Hirashita T; Kimura M; Ejima A; Matsunobu Y; Shinozuka K; Tokuyasu T; Inomata M
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8755-8763. PubMed ID: 37567981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical quality assessment of critical view of safety in 283 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos by surgical residents and surgeons.
    Grüter AAJ; Daams F; Bonjer HJ; van Duijvendijk P; Tuynman JB;
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38769182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the effect of the critical view of safety criteria on simulated operative decision-making: a pilot study.
    Niemann AC; Matusko N; Sandhu G; Varban OA
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):911-916. PubMed ID: 30167948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Nakazato T; Su B; Novak S; Deal SB; Kuchta K; Ujiki M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):4115-4123. PubMed ID: 31605213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Mascagni P; Alapatt D; Laracca GG; Guerriero L; Spota A; Fiorillo C; Vardazaryan A; Quero G; Alfieri S; Baldari L; Cassinotti E; Boni L; Cuccurullo D; Costamagna G; Dallemagne B; Padoy N
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8379-8386. PubMed ID: 35171336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety: Automatic Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Deep Learning.
    Mascagni P; Vardazaryan A; Alapatt D; Urade T; Emre T; Fiorillo C; Pessaux P; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Costamagna G; Dallemagne B; Padoy N
    Ann Surg; 2022 May; 275(5):955-961. PubMed ID: 33201104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How often do surgeons obtain the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
    Stefanidis D; Chintalapudi N; Anderson-Montoya B; Oommen B; Tobben D; Pimentel M
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):142-146. PubMed ID: 27142437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center.
    Chen CB; Palazzo F; Doane SM; Winter JM; Lavu H; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL; Yeo CJ; Pucci MJ
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1627-1635. PubMed ID: 27495348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using video-based assessment (VBA) to document fellow improvement in safely completing the jejunojejunostomy portion of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.
    Nau P; Worden E; Lehmann R; Kleppe K; Mancini GJ; Mancini ML; Ramshaw B; Woods MS
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8853-8860. PubMed ID: 37759145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Teaching Interventions.
    Nijssen MA; Schreinemakers JM; van der Schelling GP; Crolla RM; Rijken AM
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(3):442-7. PubMed ID: 26868305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Training Method for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Simulated Decision-Making Exercise to Assess the Critical View of Safety.
    Manatakis DK; Mylonakis E; Anagnostopoulos P; Lamprakakis K; Agalianos C; Korkolis DP; Dervenis C
    Surg J (N Y); 2021 Oct; 7(4):e357-e362. PubMed ID: 34966849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attending guidance advised: educational quality of surgical videos on YouTube.
    Jackson HT; Hung CS; Potarazu D; Habboosh N; DeAngelis EJ; Amdur RL; Estroff JM; Quintana MT; Lin P; Vaziri K; Lee J
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4189-4198. PubMed ID: 34668066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainee surgeons with different cholangiographic techniques (SCOTCH): a prospective non-randomized trial on the impact of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainees.
    Ortenzi M; Corallino D; Botteri E; Balla A; Arezzo A; Sartori A; Reddavid R; Montori G; Guerrieri M; Williams S; Podda M;
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):1045-1058. PubMed ID: 38135732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Situating Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Focus on Disease Severity.
    Korndorffer JR; Hawn MT; Spain DA; Knowlton LM; Azagury DE; Nassar AK; Lau JN; Arnow KD; Trickey AW; Pugh CM
    Ann Surg; 2020 Sep; 272(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 33759839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.