135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37892057)
1. Characteristics of Mandibular Arch Forms in Patients with Skeletal Mandibular Prognathism.
Ichikawa E; Tachiki C; Nojima K; Matsunaga S; Sugahara K; Watanabe A; Kasahara N; Nishii Y
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37892057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in skeletal class II malocclusions].
Wu J; Jiang J; Zou W; Xu T; Liu X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 24437297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Correlation between Mandibular Arch Shape and Vertical Skeletal Pattern.
Ciavarella D; Lorusso M; Fanelli C; Cazzolla AP; Maci M; Ferrara D; Lo Muzio L; Tepedino M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Oct; 59(11):. PubMed ID: 38003975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
Tyan S; Park HS; Janchivdorj M; Han SH; Kim SJ; Ahn HW
Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 26192894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.
Celebi AA; Keklik H; Tan E; Ucar FI
Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 27275615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Class II camouflage treatment on anterior arch length ratio and canine relationship.
Barros SE; Chiqueto K; Janson G; Faria J; Moraes L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e7-e16. PubMed ID: 33234459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group.
Wahaj A; Ahmed I
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 26577967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The extraction of permanent second molars and its effect on the dentofacial complex of patients treated with the Tip-Edge appliance.
Greatrex PA; Sampson WJ; Richards LC; Twelftree CC
Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):501-18. PubMed ID: 12407946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.
Hesby RM; Marshall SD; Dawson DV; Southard KA; Casko JS; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion.
Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy.
Ronay V; Miner RM; Will LA; Arai K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 18774089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Evaluation of Mandibular Dental and Basal Arch Dimensions in Class I and Class II Division 1 Adult Syrian Patients using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Al-Hilal LH; Sultan K; Hajeer MY; Mahmoud G; Wanli AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 29728549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion.
Walkow TM; Peck S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12490871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spontaneous mandibular arch response after rapid palatal expansion: a long-term study on Class I malocclusion.
Lima AC; Lima AL; Filho RM; Oyen OJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 15520690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Archform comparisons between skeletal class II and III malocclusions.
Zou W; Wu J; Jiang J; Xu T; Li C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100655. PubMed ID: 24971597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
Kumari M; Fida M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the prefabricated forms of NiTi archwires on orthodontic forces delivered to the mandibular dental arch.
Tachi A; Tochigi K; Saze N; Arai K
Prog Orthod; 2021 Dec; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 34850299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
