These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37892057)
1. Characteristics of Mandibular Arch Forms in Patients with Skeletal Mandibular Prognathism. Ichikawa E; Tachiki C; Nojima K; Matsunaga S; Sugahara K; Watanabe A; Kasahara N; Nishii Y Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37892057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in skeletal class II malocclusions]. Wu J; Jiang J; Zou W; Xu T; Liu X Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 24437297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Correlation between Mandibular Arch Shape and Vertical Skeletal Pattern. Ciavarella D; Lorusso M; Fanelli C; Cazzolla AP; Maci M; Ferrara D; Lo Muzio L; Tepedino M Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Oct; 59(11):. PubMed ID: 38003975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Tyan S; Park HS; Janchivdorj M; Han SH; Kim SJ; Ahn HW Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 26192894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American. Celebi AA; Keklik H; Tan E; Ucar FI Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 27275615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Class II camouflage treatment on anterior arch length ratio and canine relationship. Barros SE; Chiqueto K; Janson G; Faria J; Moraes L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e7-e16. PubMed ID: 33234459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group. Wahaj A; Ahmed I J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 26577967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The extraction of permanent second molars and its effect on the dentofacial complex of patients treated with the Tip-Edge appliance. Greatrex PA; Sampson WJ; Richards LC; Twelftree CC Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):501-18. PubMed ID: 12407946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth. Hesby RM; Marshall SD; Dawson DV; Southard KA; Casko JS; Franciscus RG; Southard TE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion. Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Ronay V; Miner RM; Will LA; Arai K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 18774089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Evaluation of Mandibular Dental and Basal Arch Dimensions in Class I and Class II Division 1 Adult Syrian Patients using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Al-Hilal LH; Sultan K; Hajeer MY; Mahmoud G; Wanli AA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 29728549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion. Walkow TM; Peck S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12490871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions. Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spontaneous mandibular arch response after rapid palatal expansion: a long-term study on Class I malocclusion. Lima AC; Lima AL; Filho RM; Oyen OJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 15520690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Archform comparisons between skeletal class II and III malocclusions. Zou W; Wu J; Jiang J; Xu T; Li C PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100655. PubMed ID: 24971597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Kumari M; Fida M J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the prefabricated forms of NiTi archwires on orthodontic forces delivered to the mandibular dental arch. Tachi A; Tochigi K; Saze N; Arai K Prog Orthod; 2021 Dec; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 34850299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial. Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]